The Limitation Act, 1963
📘 The Limitation Act, 1963
1. Introduction
The Limitation Act, 1963 is a crucial statute in Indian civil law that prescribes the time limits (periods of limitation) within which legal proceedings must be initiated. Its purpose is to promote justice by preventing the revival of stale claims and to encourage timely resolution of disputes.
The Act consolidates and amends the laws relating to the period of limitation for various suits, appeals, and applications in civil cases.
2. Background
Before the Limitation Act, 1963, limitation periods were governed by several different enactments.
The Act codified and unified these provisions to avoid confusion and inconsistencies.
The principle is that a person cannot sue indefinitely after a cause of action arises; there must be a reasonable time frame.
3. Objectives of the Act
To prescribe periods of limitation for different types of legal actions.
To ensure certainty and finality in legal proceedings.
To discourage parties from delaying litigation unduly.
To provide legal security by barring stale claims.
4. Key Provisions
Section 3 – Application of the Act
The Act applies to all suits, appeals, and applications filed in civil courts across India unless specifically excluded.
Section 4 – Computation of Period of Limitation
The limitation period starts from the date when the cause of action arises.
Specific rules for computing time, including exclusion of the day on which the cause of action arose, are provided.
Special provisions exist for cases where the plaintiff is under a disability (minority, insanity).
Section 5 – Extension of Period in Certain Cases
The Act allows extension of limitation in cases where the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing on time.
Courts have discretion to condone delay if justified.
Section 6 – Exclusion of Time Taken in Legal Proceedings
Time spent in legal proceedings in a competent court related to the suit or appeal is excluded from the limitation period in some cases.
Section 14 – Effect of Limitation
Once the limitation period expires, the suit or application is barred and cannot be entertained by the court.
Limitation is a substantive law and a defense available even if not raised by the opposite party.
Schedule of the Act
The Act contains a Schedule listing specific limitation periods for various kinds of suits and applications, such as:
Suits relating to contracts: 3 years
Suits relating to recovery of money: 3 years
Suits for possession of immovable property: 12 years
Suits for recovery of immovable property under tenancy laws: 6 months
Appeals: 30 to 90 days depending on the case.
5. Principles Underlying the Limitation Act
Laches and acquiescence: Delay in asserting a right may lead to it being barred.
Peace and stability: Litigation should not be allowed to drag indefinitely.
Equity and fairness: While strict, the Act allows courts to condone delays for sufficient cause.
6. Important Case Law
Case 1: State of U.P. v. Singhara Singh, AIR 1964 SC 358
Issue: Whether limitation is a procedural or substantive law.
Held: The Supreme Court held that limitation is a substantive law, meaning it bars the right itself once the period expires.
Principle: Limitation is a fundamental defense that courts must consider even if not pleaded.
Case 2: Abdul Razak v. Union of India, AIR 1973 SC 1114
Issue: Whether the court can extend the limitation period arbitrarily.
Held: The court emphasized that the extension of limitation under Section 5 can only be granted when the applicant shows sufficient cause.
Principle: The court exercises discretion but must be satisfied with a genuine cause for delay.
Case 3: B.K. Verma v. Union of India, AIR 1983 SC 1470
Issue: Effect of acknowledgment on limitation period.
Held: The court held that acknowledgment of a debt or claim can restart the limitation period.
Principle: A fresh cause of action arises on acknowledgment, thus limitation begins anew.
Case 4: V.R. Srinivasa v. T.S. Karunakar (1992)
Issue: Computation of limitation period.
Held: The court clarified the starting point for limitation is the date when the cause of action first arises, not when the aggrieved party became aware.
Principle: Limitation runs from the first actionable event.
7. Exclusions and Exceptions
The Act does not apply to criminal cases.
Certain statutes have their own limitation provisions which may override this Act.
Special provisions exist for cases involving minority, insanity, or other disabilities.
8. Practical Implications
Anyone initiating a suit or appeal must be mindful of the relevant limitation period.
Courts regularly dismiss cases where limitation has expired, irrespective of merits.
Legal practitioners advise early filing to avoid issues of limitation.
Defendants frequently raise limitation as a preliminary objection.
9. Conclusion
The Limitation Act, 1963 is a fundamental law in the Indian legal system that ensures timely administration of justice by barring stale claims. It balances the rights of claimants and defendants by providing fixed periods to bring disputes before courts while allowing limited exceptions for genuine delays. Judicial interpretations reinforce its role as a substantive law and emphasize the need for genuine justification for condonation of delays.
RELATED Blog
0 comments