Human Rights Law at Bhutan
1. The Case of the Bhutanese Refugees (1990s)
The most well-known human rights issue in Bhutan is the mass exodus of ethnic Nepali Bhutanese, known as the Lhotshampa people, in the early 1990s. Ethnic Nepalis had been living in southern Bhutan for generations, but tensions between them and the government escalated, particularly in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The government pursued a policy of "One Nation, One People," which sought to impose cultural assimilation on ethnic minorities, requiring them to adopt Bhutanese dress and speak the national language, Dzongkha. Those who resisted faced discrimination and persecution.
By 1991, the government initiated a series of measures that led to the forced displacement of thousands of ethnic Nepalis. The Bhutanese government accused the refugees of being insurgents or anti-national elements, while refugees argued that they were being targeted due to their ethnicity and cultural practices. As a result, over 100,000 ethnic Nepalis fled to refugee camps in Nepal, where they remained for decades.
While Bhutan’s government maintained that the refugees were illegal immigrants, international organizations like the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) advocated for their rights. Eventually, through a resettlement process, many refugees were accepted into third countries, including the United States, Canada, and Australia. However, this case highlights the ongoing human rights concerns regarding ethnic minorities, the lack of political freedoms, and the treatment of dissenting groups in Bhutan.
2. The Case of Freedom of Expression and Political Dissent (2000s-Present)
While Bhutan transitioned to a constitutional monarchy in 2008, freedom of speech and political freedom have remained contentious issues. The country’s media landscape, though freer than in many other South Asian countries, still operates within a controlled environment. Journalists face legal restrictions, and the government has used laws like the National Security Act to limit the press's freedom.
In 2008, Jigme Namgyel, a former political activist and journalist, was arrested for his involvement in an attempt to establish a political party critical of the government. Though the government's official line was that his actions were considered illegal and posed a threat to national security, this case raised concerns about freedom of political expression in a country still governed by a monarchy.
Bhutan's criminal defamation law has also been used to target journalists and activists. For example, Tshering Tobgay, a well-known politician and former Prime Minister of Bhutan, has faced legal challenges for his public statements. This indicates the limitations on political activism and freedom of expression in Bhutan, even as the country modernizes and democratizes its political processes.
3. The Case of LGBTQ+ Rights (Ongoing Issue)
Bhutan is one of the last countries in South Asia where same-sex relationships were decriminalized relatively recently. Prior to 2021, Section 213 of the Penal Code criminalized homosexual activity. Although there was little enforcement of this law, it nonetheless reflected the prevailing societal and legal attitudes towards the LGBTQ+ community.
In 2021, Bhutan’s National Assembly finally decriminalized same-sex relationships, marking a significant shift in the country's legal stance. However, LGBTQ+ individuals continue to face social stigma and discrimination, as traditional values heavily influence public opinion. Even though the law has changed, societal acceptance and human rights advocacy in this area remain works in progress.
An example of the challenges faced by LGBTQ+ individuals is the case of a Bhutanese man who faced immense pressure to marry a woman, despite his sexual orientation. His struggle to find acceptance within his family and society highlights the cultural and social hurdles still faced by the LGBTQ+ community in Bhutan. Thus, while legal changes have occurred, much remains to be done for the full acceptance of LGBTQ+ rights in Bhutanese society.
4. The Case of Forced Labor and Exploitation of Migrant Workers
Bhutan relies on migrant labor from neighboring countries like India and Nepal for various sectors, particularly in construction and agriculture. While these workers often come to Bhutan in search of better economic opportunities, labor exploitation and poor working conditions have been reported.
One notable case involved migrant workers who were brought to Bhutan for large construction projects, including the construction of roads and hydroelectric dams. These workers were often subject to poor living conditions, low wages, and long working hours. Some workers were also unable to leave the country without the approval of their employers, effectively trapping them in exploitative situations.
Although Bhutan has laws governing labor rights, enforcement remains weak. The 2006 Labour and Employment Act outlines workers' rights to fair wages, decent working conditions, and the right to form trade unions. However, the implementation of these protections has been inconsistent, and migrant workers still face significant human rights abuses in certain industries. The government’s failure to fully protect migrant workers’ rights is an ongoing issue in the country.
5. The Case of Freedom of Religion (Minority Religious Groups)
Bhutan is a predominantly Buddhist country, and the state religion is Drukpa Kagyu Buddhism. However, religious freedom has been a contentious issue, particularly for the Hindu minority, and more recently, for Christian and other religious minorities.
In the 1990s, there were reports of religious discrimination against Hindus and Christian converts, especially in rural areas where Buddhist religious practices dominate. In some cases, individuals who were found to be practicing or promoting religions other than Buddhism faced harassment or were forced to leave their communities. The government has long been criticized for not allowing religious freedom in practice, despite constitutional guarantees.
One specific case was that of Christian missionaries being accused of proselytizing and distributing religious literature in Bhutan. In 2007, the government took action against foreign Christian missionaries, expelling some and prohibiting their activities. This action highlighted the limitations on religious freedom, even as Bhutan claims to provide protections under the law. Christians in Bhutan continue to face challenges in worshiping freely, with many practicing their faith in private.
Conclusion:
Bhutan has made important strides in improving human rights, particularly with the adoption of its Constitution in 2008, which enshrines basic freedoms and rights. However, the country faces ongoing challenges in areas such as freedom of expression, religious freedom, ethnic discrimination, and LGBTQ+ rights. Each of the above cases underscores how Bhutan's human rights situation remains complex and subject to both legal and societal influences. While progress is visible, more remains to be done to fully ensure human rights for all Bhutanese citizens, particularly marginalized groups.
RELATED Blog
comments