Law of Evidence at Lesotho
The Law of Evidence in Lesotho is primarily governed by the Lesotho Evidence Act, the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act, and the Civil Procedure Act. Lesotho follows a common law system, influenced by English law, with some aspects of customary law playing a role, especially in family law and other areas related to the traditional system.
Key Features of Evidence Law in Lesotho:
🔹 1. Types of Evidence
In Criminal Cases:
Witness Testimony:
Oral Testimony: Witnesses provide evidence under oath or affirmation. The credibility of witnesses is a crucial factor, and they may be cross-examined by the opposing party to test the reliability of their statements.
Hearsay Evidence: Generally, hearsay evidence (testimony based on what someone else said rather than direct knowledge) is not admissible in criminal trials unless it falls within certain exceptions (e.g., statements made under particular circumstances, such as in the course of business).
Confessions:
Confessions made by the accused are significant in criminal cases. However, these must be voluntary and not made under duress, coercion, or torture. A confession made under pressure is inadmissible. The accused also has the right to retract their confession if they later believe it was made wrongly.
Physical Evidence:
Evidence such as weapons, drugs, fingerprints, or any objects directly related to the crime is highly important. This type of evidence is often subject to forensic analysis, including DNA testing and fingerprint matching, to establish links to the crime.
Expert Testimony:
Experts in fields such as medicine, forensic science, and accounting can provide testimony to explain complex or technical issues in the case. Their role is to clarify evidence and provide an expert opinion that assists the court in understanding specialized aspects of the case.
Documentary Evidence:
Written documents such as contracts, letters, or official records are often crucial in criminal cases. These documents must be authenticated to ensure they are genuine and not tampered with.
Circumstantial Evidence:
While direct evidence is preferable, circumstantial evidence (indirect evidence) can also be powerful in linking the defendant to a crime. For example, evidence that suggests the accused had a motive or was at the scene of the crime, even if no one saw the crime occur directly.
In Civil Cases:
Witness Testimony:
Just as in criminal law, witness testimony plays a significant role in civil disputes. The credibility of witnesses is crucial in determining the outcome of the case.
Documents:
Written evidence (contracts, agreements, letters, etc.) is essential in civil disputes. Documents that are properly executed, such as signed contracts, hold considerable weight in proving claims.
Presumptions:
Presumptions are used in civil cases when direct evidence is unavailable. For example, if someone has been in possession of something for a certain period, it might be presumed they are the owner of that item.
Expert Evidence:
Expert witnesses can also be called in civil cases to provide specialized knowledge, particularly in cases involving property disputes, construction, or financial matters.
🔹 2. Rules on Admissibility of Evidence
The Lesotho Evidence Act and the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act set out clear guidelines for the admissibility of evidence. Key principles include:
Relevance:
Evidence must be relevant to the case. If evidence does not relate to the facts in dispute, it will generally be excluded.
Authenticity:
Documents and physical evidence must be authentic to be admissible. For instance, the original document is usually preferred over a copy, and it must be shown that it is not tampered with.
Hearsay Rule:
Hearsay evidence (statements made outside of court by someone who is not present) is generally not admissible, unless it falls into an exception (e.g., dying declarations, business records).
Privilege:
Legal professional privilege: Communications between a lawyer and their client are protected, meaning they cannot be used as evidence without the client's consent.
Spousal privilege: A spouse cannot be compelled to testify against their partner in certain circumstances, such as in cases involving private family matters.
Confessions:
As mentioned earlier, confessions are admissible only if made voluntarily and without coercion. Statements made under duress or obtained through illegal means are inadmissible.
Witness Credibility:
The credibility of witnesses is a significant factor in determining the value of their testimony. Judges have discretion to assess whether a witness is truthful and reliable.
🔹 3. Burden of Proof
In Criminal Cases:
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution. It must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a high standard of proof, and if there is any reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt, they must be acquitted.
In Civil Cases:
In civil cases, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff (the party making the claim). The standard of proof is balance of probabilities, meaning the plaintiff must prove their case is more likely than not to be true.
🔹 4. Recent Developments and Challenges
Digital and Electronic Evidence:
As in many other countries, the use of electronic evidence (emails, phone records, social media posts, digital contracts, etc.) is becoming increasingly important in criminal and civil cases in Lesotho. However, legal frameworks around digital evidence are still developing.
Witness Protection:
There have been discussions about enhancing witness protection laws, especially in high-profile criminal cases. Lesotho has experienced challenges with protecting witnesses in serious cases like organized crime or corruption.
Access to Justice:
Access to justice and the fair treatment of witnesses and defendants continue to be key areas of legal reform. Efforts to improve the legal system’s transparency and fairness are ongoing, particularly for those who may not have the financial means to access legal representation.
🔹 5. Customary Law and Its Role in Evidence
While Lesotho predominantly follows common law principles, customary law may still play a role in family law or land disputes, especially in rural areas. In such cases, traditional leaders may serve as witnesses or provide testimony in cases involving customary practices. However, the use of customary law is generally subject to the constitution and does not supersede statutory law.
Conclusion
The Law of Evidence in Lesotho is based on common law principles, influenced by English law. In both criminal and civil cases, evidence such as witness testimony, documents, confessions, and physical evidence are central. The burden of proof lies with the prosecution in criminal cases and the plaintiff in civil cases, with the standard of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases and balance of probabilities in civil cases. Legal reforms, especially in the areas of digital evidence and witness protection, continue to evolve.
RELATED Blog
0 comments