Law of Evidence at Croatia
In Croatia, the Law of Evidence is primarily governed by the Civil Procedure Act (Zakon o civilnom postupku) and the Criminal Procedure Act (Zakon o kaznenom postupku), which outline the rules for presenting, admitting, and evaluating evidence in civil and criminal cases, respectively. Croatian law is based on the civil law tradition, and its legal system draws from European norms, with a strong emphasis on fairness, legal certainty, and respect for individual rights.
1. Civil Procedure Act (Zakon o civilnom postupku)
The Civil Procedure Act regulates the presentation and use of evidence in civil cases. It sets out detailed rules on the types of evidence, the admissibility of evidence, and how evidence is evaluated in court.
Types of Evidence in Civil Cases
The Act recognizes several types of evidence that can be used in civil proceedings, including:
Testimony (Oral evidence): Statements made by witnesses who testify to facts they have directly observed or experienced. Witnesses are subject to examination and cross-examination in court.
Documents (Documentary evidence): Written or electronic documents, such as contracts, letters, invoices, and emails, which can serve as evidence. Documents must be submitted in original or certified form.
Physical Evidence (Real evidence): Tangible items that may help establish facts in a case, such as objects, photographs, or models.
Expert Evidence: Specialists or experts may be called upon to provide professional opinions on complex matters that require specialized knowledge (e.g., medical, technical, or financial expertise).
Presumptions: The Act also allows for certain legal presumptions to be made. A presumption can lead to conclusions being drawn based on established facts, unless evidence is presented to the contrary.
Burden of Proof
In Croatian civil law, the party making the claim (the plaintiff) bears the burden of proof. This means that they must present sufficient evidence to establish the facts of their case. The defendant does not have to prove their innocence, but they may present evidence to refute the plaintiff’s claims.
Admissibility of Evidence
Only relevant, legal, and legitimate evidence can be presented in Croatian courts. The judge plays a central role in determining whether the evidence meets these criteria.
Relevance: The evidence must directly relate to the disputed facts of the case.
Legality: Evidence must be obtained in accordance with the law. For example, evidence obtained through illegal means (e.g., unauthorized searches) is typically inadmissible.
Reliability: The evidence must be credible and trustworthy. The court has discretion in evaluating the weight of evidence.
Witnesses and Examination
Witness Testimony: Witnesses are required to testify about facts within their knowledge, and they must be examined in court. Both parties can question witnesses (cross-examination).
Examination and Cross-Examination: The process allows each side to test the credibility and reliability of the opposing party’s evidence. The judge may also ask questions.
2. Criminal Procedure Act (Zakon o kaznenom postupku)
The Criminal Procedure Act governs the rules related to evidence in criminal proceedings. It outlines how evidence is to be collected, presented, and assessed in criminal trials, with a focus on safeguarding the rights of the accused.
Types of Evidence in Criminal Cases
Testimony: As in civil cases, testimony from witnesses is a key form of evidence. In criminal cases, witnesses are often crucial for proving the defendant's guilt or innocence.
Physical Evidence: Items such as weapons, drugs, or documents that have been found in relation to the crime.
Expert Opinions: Experts in fields like forensic science, medicine, or technical analysis may be called to assist the court in understanding the evidence presented.
Confessions: Statements made by the accused may be admitted as evidence, but only if they are voluntary and not obtained through coercion or duress.
Circumstantial Evidence: In many criminal cases, evidence may be circumstantial, meaning it supports a conclusion about the facts of the case, even if it does not directly prove them. This type of evidence may include behaviors, locations, or actions taken by the accused.
Presumption of Innocence
The presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle of Croatian criminal law. The prosecution bears the burden of proving the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant does not need to prove their innocence.
Hearsay Evidence
Hearsay evidence (i.e., statements made outside of court) is generally not admissible in Croatian criminal cases. However, there are exceptions, such as when the person who made the statement is unavailable to testify.
Chain of Custody
In criminal cases, maintaining a proper chain of custody is critical for physical evidence. This ensures that evidence presented in court is the same as the evidence originally collected, preventing tampering or contamination.
3. General Principles of Evidence in Croatia
Croatia’s laws on evidence adhere to several core principles:
Legality: Evidence must be gathered and presented in accordance with the law. Any evidence obtained in violation of the law is generally inadmissible.
Relevance: Evidence must be pertinent to the issues in dispute. Irrelevant evidence, even if obtained legally, will not be accepted by the court.
Free Evaluation of Evidence: Croatian courts are tasked with freely evaluating the evidence presented. Judges are not strictly bound by any specific type of evidence, but they must weigh the credibility and relevance of each piece of evidence and give a reasoned judgment.
Right to Fair Trial: Under the European Convention on Human Rights, to which Croatia is a party, individuals are entitled to a fair trial. This includes the right to present evidence in their defense and to challenge the evidence presented against them.
4. Admissibility of Electronic Evidence
With the rise of digital communication and technology, electronic evidence (emails, digital files, records of phone calls, etc.) is increasingly important in both civil and criminal cases in Croatia. Electronic evidence is accepted in court but must meet certain criteria:
Authenticity: The authenticity of the electronic evidence must be proven. This could involve presenting metadata or verification from a reliable source.
Integrity: The evidence must be preserved without alteration, which is why maintaining a chain of custody for digital evidence is essential.
5. Privileges and Exemptions
Certain types of evidence are protected from disclosure under Croatian law:
Legal Privilege: Communications between a lawyer and their client are generally protected and cannot be used as evidence.
Medical Privilege: Medical professionals cannot be forced to disclose information that is considered confidential, except in specific situations defined by law.
6. Role of the Judge in Evaluating Evidence
In both civil and criminal cases, the judge plays a key role in assessing the evidence presented. While judges must give significant weight to evidence that has been legally and properly submitted, they are not bound to automatically accept any evidence without scrutiny. They are required to provide reasons for their decisions based on the evaluation of the evidence.
Conclusion
The Law of Evidence in Croatia is structured to ensure fairness, transparency, and the protection of rights for all parties involved. The principles of legality, relevance, and free evaluation guide how evidence is presented and assessed in civil and criminal cases. Whether in courtrooms dealing with disputes between private individuals or in criminal trials, Croatian courts ensure that evidence is carefully evaluated, with the primary aim of delivering just outcomes based on the facts presented.
RELATED Blog
0 comments