Law of Evidence at Malaysia
Malaysia's Evidence Act 1950 (Act 56) serves as the cornerstone of its legal framework for the admissibility of evidence in both civil and criminal proceedings. This Act has been amended over time to address evolving legal needs, particularly concerning the integration of electronic evidence. ((PDF) Evaluating Electronic Evidence in Malaysian Civil Courts: Current Admissibility and Future Legal Directions)
📜 Overview of the Evidence Act 1950
The Evidence Act 1950 is structured into several parts:
Part I: Relevancy – Defines what constitutes relevant facts and the circumstances under which they are admissible.
Part II: Proof – Outlines the methods by which facts may be proved, including oral testimony, documentary evidence, and presumptions.
Part III: Production and Effect of Evidence – Details the procedures for presenting evidence in court and the legal implications thereof. (Act 56 - Evidence Act 1950 - Part II - Laws of Malaysia - Legislation - Lawyerment)
The Act provides comprehensive guidelines on the types of evidence admissible in Malaysian courts, emphasizing the importance of relevance, authenticity, and reliability. (Act 56 - Evidence Act 1950 - Laws of Malaysia - Legislation - Lawyerment)
💻 Admissibility of Electronic Evidence
Recognizing the increasing role of digital information, Malaysia has incorporated provisions to address the admissibility of electronic evidence:
Section 90A: Allows for the admission of documents produced by computers, provided they were generated in the course of the computer's ordinary use. A certificate from a person responsible for the computer's operation can authenticate such documents. ((PDF) Evaluating Electronic Evidence in Malaysian Civil Courts: Current Admissibility and Future Legal Directions)
Section 90B: Covers the admissibility of electronic records, including emails and digital communications, under similar conditions as physical documents.
Section 90C: Pertains to the admissibility of statements made by individuals in electronic form, subject to specific criteria ensuring their authenticity.
These sections aim to facilitate the use of electronic evidence while maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. ((PDF) Evaluating Electronic Evidence in Malaysian Civil Courts: Current Admissibility and Future Legal Directions)
⚖️ Judicial Considerations
Malaysian courts assess electronic evidence based on:
Relevance: The evidence must pertain directly to the matter at hand. (Evidence (Amendment) Act (no. 2) - Act A1432 (2012) | ICJ)
Authenticity: There must be assurance that the evidence has not been tampered with and is a true representation of the original data.
Reliability: The method of data collection and preservation should be consistent with accepted standards to ensure the evidence's credibility.
The judiciary also considers the potential for electronic evidence to be altered or corrupted, necessitating stringent protocols for its handling and presentation in court. (Evidence Act: e-evidence and e-forensic digital forensic)
🔄 Recent Amendments
The Evidence (Amendment) Act (No. 2) 2012 (Act A1432) introduced updates to the definition of "computer," reflecting advancements in technology and the increasing complexity of digital systems. This amendment ensures that the legal framework remains relevant in the face of rapid technological changes. (Evidence (Amendment) Act (no. 2) - Act A1432 (2012) | ICJ)
🧭 Conclusion
Malaysia's Evidence Act 1950 provides a robust framework for the admissibility of evidence, including provisions for electronic records. While the Act facilitates the use of digital evidence, it also imposes strict requirements to safeguard the integrity of the judicial process. Legal professionals must navigate these provisions carefully to ensure the proper handling and presentation of electronic evidence in Malaysian courts.Malaysia's Evidence Act 1950 (Act 56) serves as the cornerstone of its legal framework for the admissibility of evidence in both civil and criminal proceedings. This Act has been amended over time to address evolving legal needs, particularly concerning the integration of electronic evidence. ((PDF) Evaluating Electronic Evidence in Malaysian Civil Courts: Current Admissibility and Future Legal Directions)
📜 Overview of the Evidence Act 1950
The Evidence Act 1950 is structured into several parts:
Part I: Relevancy – Defines what constitutes relevant facts and the circumstances under which they are admissible.
Part II: Proof – Outlines the methods by which facts may be proved, including oral testimony, documentary evidence, and presumptions.
Part III: Production and Effect of Evidence – Details the procedures for presenting evidence in court and the legal implications thereof. (Act 56 - Evidence Act 1950 - Part II - Laws of Malaysia - Legislation - Lawyerment)
The Act provides comprehensive guidelines on the types of evidence admissible in Malaysian courts, emphasizing the importance of relevance, authenticity, and reliability. (Act 56 - Evidence Act 1950 - Laws of Malaysia - Legislation - Lawyerment)
💻 Admissibility of Electronic Evidence
Recognizing the increasing role of digital information, Malaysia has incorporated provisions to address the admissibility of electronic evidence:
Section 90A: Allows for the admission of documents produced by computers, provided they were generated in the course of the computer's ordinary use. A certificate from a person responsible for the computer's operation can authenticate such documents. ((PDF) Evaluating Electronic Evidence in Malaysian Civil Courts: Current Admissibility and Future Legal Directions)
Section 90B: Covers the admissibility of electronic records, including emails and digital communications, under similar conditions as physical documents.
Section 90C: Pertains to the admissibility of statements made by individuals in electronic form, subject to specific criteria ensuring their authenticity.
These sections aim to facilitate the use of electronic evidence while maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. ((PDF) Evaluating Electronic Evidence in Malaysian Civil Courts: Current Admissibility and Future Legal Directions)
⚖️ Judicial Considerations
Malaysian courts assess electronic evidence based on:
Relevance: The evidence must pertain directly to the matter at hand. (Evidence (Amendment) Act (no. 2) - Act A1432 (2012) | ICJ)
Authenticity: There must be assurance that the evidence has not been tampered with and is a true representation of the original data.
Reliability: The method of data collection and preservation should be consistent with accepted standards to ensure the evidence's credibility.
The judiciary also considers the potential for electronic evidence to be altered or corrupted, necessitating stringent protocols for its handling and presentation in court. (Evidence Act: e-evidence and e-forensic digital forensic)
🔄 Recent Amendments
The Evidence (Amendment) Act (No. 2) 2012 (Act A1432) introduced updates to the definition of "computer," reflecting advancements in technology and the increasing complexity of digital systems. This amendment ensures that the legal framework remains relevant in the face of rapid technological changes. (Evidence (Amendment) Act (no. 2) - Act A1432 (2012) | ICJ)
🧭 Conclusion
Malaysia's Evidence Act 1950 provides a robust framework for the admissibility of evidence, including provisions for electronic records. While the Act facilitates the use of digital evidence, it also imposes strict requirements to safeguard the integrity of the judicial process. Legal professionals must navigate these provisions carefully to ensure the proper handling and presentation of electronic evidence in Malaysian courts.
RELATED Blog
0 comments