Misrepresentation in Contract Law

📘 Misrepresentation in Contract Law (Indian Contract Act, 1872)

⚖️ Definition:

Under Section 18 of the Indian Contract Act, misrepresentation refers to a false statement of fact made innocently (i.e., without intent to deceive) which induces the other party to enter into a contract.

🔍 Key Elements of Misrepresentation:

ElementDescription
1️⃣ False RepresentationA statement of fact that is not true.
2️⃣ Made InnocentlyThe person believes it to be true; no intention to deceive (unlike fraud).
3️⃣ Relied Upon by the Other PartyThe other party must have relied on this false statement while entering the contract.
4️⃣ Induces the ContractThe false statement influences the decision of the other party to contract.

📚 Types of Misrepresentation (Section 18):

TypeMeaning
🔹 Positive Assertion Without JustificationSaying something is true without verifying its truth.
🔹 Breach of Duty Without Intent to DeceiveWhere one has a duty to speak truthfully but fails to do so innocently.
🔹 Innocent Causing of MistakeWhen the act causes the other party to make a mistake on the subject matter without intent.

📌 Effect of Misrepresentation (Section 19):

The contract is voidable at the option of the party misled.

The affected party may:

Rescind (cancel) the contract, or

Accept the contract and claim damages (if any loss suffered).

However, if the truth could have been discovered with reasonable diligence, the party cannot rescind.

⚖️ Important Case Laws:

CasePrinciple
🔹 Derry v. PeekDistinguished between fraud and misrepresentation.
🔹 Redgrave v. HurdEven if the party could have discovered the truth, if they relied on the misrepresentation, they can rescind.
🔹 With v. O’FlanaganA change in circumstances must be disclosed to avoid misrepresentation.

🆚 Misrepresentation vs Fraud:

BasisMisrepresentationFraud
IntentionNo intent to deceiveIntentional deception
DamagesMay not always be claimedCan claim damages
NatureInnocentWillful/wrongful

Conclusion:

Misrepresentation involves innocent falsehood that leads to a contract. It invalidates free consent and allows the misled party to void the agreement.

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments