Ultzen v Nichols
Ultzen v. Nichols (1911)
Case Background:
This is an English contract law case that deals with the communication of acceptance and when a contract is formed.
The case clarifies the rules around acceptance by post and when acceptance is considered valid and binding.
Facts of the Case:
Ultzen sent an offer by post to Nichols.
Nichols posted his acceptance letter.
However, the acceptance letter got lost in transit and was never received by Ultzen.
Ultzen claimed that since he never received the acceptance, no contract was formed.
Legal Issue:
Whether a contract is formed when acceptance is posted (sent), or when it is received by the offeror.
More specifically: Does posting the acceptance create a binding contract even if the offeror never receives it?
Judgment:
The court held that acceptance is effective when it is posted (sent), not when received.
Therefore, the contract was formed at the moment Nichols posted his acceptance.
The loss or delay of the acceptance letter after posting does not affect the validity of acceptance.
Principles Established:
Postal Rule of Acceptance:
Acceptance is complete as soon as it is dispatched by post, provided it is properly addressed and stamped.
Risk of Loss Lies with Offeror After Posting:
If acceptance is lost or delayed after posting, the offeror bears the risk.
Contract Formation:
Contract is formed when acceptance is sent, not necessarily when received.
Significance of the Case:
This case confirms the “postal acceptance rule” which is an important exception to the general rule that acceptance must be communicated.
It protects the offeree, so they are not penalized if the acceptance is lost in transmission.
It emphasizes that postal communication creates a contract once posted, which can affect commercial transactions and timing.
Connection with Other Cases:
This principle is also seen in Adams v. Lindsell (1818) — the foundational case for the postal rule.
It contrasts with cases where acceptance is by instantaneous communication (e.g., phone, face-to-face), where acceptance is effective only on receipt.
Application in Indian Contract Law:
Indian Contract Act recognizes communication of acceptance as necessary for contract formation.
However, in the case of postal acceptance, the law aligns with this rule: acceptance is complete when the letter is posted.
This helps manage contractual obligations in communication across distances.
Summary Table
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Case Name | Ultzen v. Nichols (1911) |
| Legal Issue | When is acceptance effective via post? |
| Court Decision | Acceptance is effective when posted |
| Principle Established | Postal rule of acceptance |
| Risk | Lies with offeror after acceptance is posted |
| Importance | Protects offeree; defines contract formation time in postal communication |
RELATED Blog
0 comments