Law of Evidence at Palestine
The Law of Evidence in Palestine is influenced by a complex legal history, combining Ottoman, British Mandate, Jordanian, Egyptian, and Palestinian Authority legal systems. Here's a general overview of how evidence law is handled in Palestine, particularly in the West Bank and Gaza Strip:
📚 Key Influences on Evidence Law in Palestine
Ottoman Law
The Ottoman Code of Civil Procedure (1879) and Ottoman Penal Code (1858) still influence the foundational legal framework.
British Mandate Law (1917–1948)
The British introduced common law principles, including parts of the Evidence Ordinance, which still influences some current practices.
Jordanian Law (West Bank)
After 1948, the West Bank was annexed by Jordan, and the Jordanian Law of Evidence (1952) is still partially applied in the West Bank courts.
Egyptian Law (Gaza Strip)
In Gaza, Egyptian law (mainly civil law tradition) was applied, including their rules of evidence.
Palestinian Authority (Post-1994)
Since the establishment of the Palestinian Authority (PA), there have been efforts to unify and modernize the legal system, but significant discrepancies remain between the West Bank and Gaza.
🔍 General Principles of Evidence Law in Palestine
Admissibility: Judges have broad discretion to admit or reject evidence.
Types of Evidence: Includes oral testimony, written documents, physical evidence, and digital/technical evidence (though not comprehensively regulated).
Burden of Proof: Generally lies with the claimant or prosecutor.
Witness Testimony: Governed by procedural rules; must be credible and legally competent.
Documentary Evidence: Strongly emphasized in civil matters.
Forensic Evidence: Used in criminal cases, but the standards and institutional infrastructure may vary in quality.
⚖️ Challenges
Lack of a unified Evidence Law across all Palestinian territories.
Ongoing political division between Fatah (West Bank) and Hamas (Gaza) causes legal fragmentation.
Limited legislative development due to the frozen Palestinian Legislative Council.
0 comments