The Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970
📘 The Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970
🟦 1. Introduction and Background
The Act was enacted in 1970 to expand the criminal appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India.
Prior to this Act, the Supreme Court's power to hear appeals in criminal cases was relatively limited.
This legislation significantly widened the scope for criminal appeals to be admitted and decided by the Supreme Court, enhancing the possibility of justice in serious criminal matters.
🟦 2. Objective
To enable the Supreme Court to hear appeals against any judgment, sentence, or order in a criminal case passed by any High Court.
The Act aims to:
Strengthen criminal justice.
Ensure uniformity in the application of criminal law.
Provide a higher forum for redressal of grave injustices.
🟦 3. Applicability and Scope
Applies to all criminal cases in India.
The Supreme Court can entertain appeals from:
High Courts.
Special Courts (if so empowered).
The Act is not confined to certain categories of offenses, unlike earlier provisions which were often restricted to certain cases like death sentences or convictions involving severe penalties.
🟦 4. Key Provisions
🔹 Section 2 – Enlargement of Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court’s criminal appellate jurisdiction is extended to include appeals from any High Court decision in criminal cases.
This means any party aggrieved by a High Court criminal judgment can seek special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.
🔹 Section 3 – Special Leave to Appeal
The Supreme Court can grant special leave to appeal in any criminal case.
This power is discretionary and allows the Court to admit appeals even if they would not ordinarily qualify for appeal under earlier laws.
The Court can review both questions of fact and law.
🔹 Section 4 – Powers of Supreme Court in Criminal Appeals
Upon hearing the appeal, the Supreme Court may:
Confirm, reverse, or modify the sentence or judgment.
Remit the case back to the High Court or trial court for retrial or fresh investigation.
Pass any other order it deems fit.
🟦 5. Significance of the Act
Broadens access to the Supreme Court in criminal matters.
Helps correct miscarriages of justice by enabling the highest court to intervene.
Enhances judicial scrutiny of serious criminal cases.
Serves as a check on arbitrary or erroneous judgments by lower courts.
⚖️ 6. Relevant Case Law
✅ 1. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam (2003) 5 SCC 318
Issue: Scope of the Supreme Court’s discretion in granting special leave to appeal in criminal cases.
Held: The Court held that special leave is a discretionary power, to be exercised sparingly but not denied where there is a substantial question of law or gross miscarriage of justice.
Significance: Emphasized the importance of this Act in ensuring justice.
✅ 2. Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684
Issue: Application of the Act in death penalty cases.
Held: Supreme Court, using its enlarged jurisdiction, upheld constitutional safeguards for death penalty cases.
Significance: Demonstrated how the Act supports judicial review of severe criminal sentences.
✅ 3. Swaran Singh v. State of Punjab (1976) 1 SCC 673
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court can entertain appeals in criminal cases involving minor procedural errors.
Held: The Court stated that appeals under this Act should focus on substantial questions of law or fact affecting justice.
Significance: Prevents frivolous appeals while preserving the right to appeal in serious matters.
✅ 4. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) Supp (1) SCC 335
Issue: Invocation of the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction in criminal appeals under this Act.
Held: Court explained the importance of the Act in the context of ensuring fair trial and protection of accused’s rights.
Significance: Reinforced the role of the Supreme Court as the ultimate guardian in criminal justice.
🟦 7. Summary Table
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Enacted | 1970 |
| Purpose | To enlarge Supreme Court's criminal appellate jurisdiction |
| Jurisdiction | Appeals against any High Court criminal decision |
| Scope | All criminal cases |
| Special Leave to Appeal | Discretionary power of Supreme Court |
| Powers on Appeal | Confirm, reverse, modify, remit cases |
| Significance | Correct miscarriages of justice, uniformity in criminal law |
🟦 8. Conclusion
The Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 plays a crucial role in the Indian criminal justice system by broadening the avenues of appeal in criminal cases to the Supreme Court. This has strengthened the protection of individual rights and enhanced the quality of justice dispensed by enabling the apex court to intervene in cases of significant legal or factual errors. The Act ensures that the Supreme Court remains the ultimate forum to correct errors and uphold the rule of law in criminal jurisprudence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments