The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956
The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956
Introduction
The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 is a crucial legislation enacted by the Parliament of India to resolve disputes related to the use, distribution, and management of water from rivers that flow across two or more states (inter-state rivers). Since water is a state subject but rivers often flow across multiple states, conflicts frequently arise over sharing and usage rights.
The Act provides a legal framework for the central government to constitute tribunals to adjudicate disputes between states concerning inter-state rivers and their waters.
Objectives of the Act
To provide a mechanism for resolution of disputes between states regarding sharing and use of inter-state river waters.
To avoid prolonged conflicts and potential tensions over water resources.
To promote equitable and reasonable utilization of river waters among states.
To empower the central government to constitute tribunals for adjudication.
Applicability
The Act applies to all inter-state river water disputes between states or between states and the Union Territories.
It is invoked when states are unable to resolve disputes amicably.
Key Provisions of the Act
1. Reference to the Central Government (Section 3)
If a dispute arises between two or more states regarding the water of an inter-state river, any state government may request the Central Government to refer the dispute to a tribunal.
The Central Government, after considering the matter, may constitute a tribunal to adjudicate.
2. Constitution of Tribunal (Section 4)
The Central Government appoints a tribunal consisting of one or more members.
Members are usually judges or experts with knowledge of water law and related fields.
The tribunal functions as a judicial authority with the power to hear and decide disputes.
3. Powers of Tribunal (Section 5)
The tribunal has the powers of a civil court for summoning witnesses, enforcing attendance, examining documents, etc.
It can regulate its own procedure.
Its decision is binding on the parties.
4. Tribunal’s Award (Section 6)
After hearing, the tribunal delivers its award, which includes:
Allocation of water shares,
Regulations on usage,
Directions for cooperation among states.
The award is binding on the states involved.
5. Implementation of Award (Section 6A)
The Central Government ensures the implementation of the tribunal’s award.
The government can issue directions to states to comply.
Failure to comply may invite central intervention.
6. Appeal and Review (Section 7)
The Act initially did not provide for appeals against tribunal awards.
However, judicial review by the Supreme Court is available on limited grounds.
7. Other Provisions
The Act also provides for conciliation efforts before reference.
It encourages states to settle disputes through negotiations before tribunal formation.
Legal Principles
1. Equitable Apportionment
Water allocation should be equitable and reasonable considering the needs and benefits of all states.
The tribunal balances competing interests fairly.
2. No Exclusive Ownership
No state has exclusive ownership over an inter-state river.
All riparian states have rights subject to reasonable use.
3. Binding Nature of Tribunal Awards
Tribunal awards under the Act have the force of law and are binding.
States are obligated to comply.
Relevant Case Laws
1. Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal Cases
Multiple decisions on allocation of Krishna river waters among Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Telangana.
Established principles of equitable apportionment and consideration of existing usage.
2. Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal Cases
Long-standing dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.
The Tribunal’s award on water sharing was subject to multiple interpretations and legal challenges.
The Supreme Court upheld the tribunal’s award as binding but also emphasized ongoing negotiations and central government role.
3. Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1990 SC 267)
Held that the Central Government's decision to constitute a tribunal is discretionary but must be exercised judiciously.
States cannot compel the government to form a tribunal unless a genuine dispute exists.
4. Sardar Sarovar Project Case
The Supreme Court referred to the Act while adjudicating issues related to the Narmada river and the Sardar Sarovar dam.
Emphasized that development projects must comply with tribunal awards and inter-state water sharing agreements.
Practical Implications
The Act provides a peaceful judicial mechanism for resolving conflicts over water resources.
It encourages states to negotiate and cooperate in the use of shared rivers.
Ensures optimal and sustainable use of water for agriculture, drinking water, and industrial purposes.
Strengthens the role of the Central Government in facilitating water dispute resolution.
Summary Table
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Enacted Year | 1956 |
| Purpose | Resolution of disputes over inter-state river water sharing |
| Tribunal Constitution | By Central Government on state request |
| Powers of Tribunal | Civil court powers, binding award |
| Implementation | Central Government supervises compliance |
| Appeal | Limited judicial review available in Supreme Court |
| Legal Principles | Equitable apportionment, no exclusive ownership, binding nature of awards |
| Important Cases | Cauvery Tribunal, Krishna Tribunal, Tehri Hydro case |
Conclusion
The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 is a vital legal framework for resolving conflicts between states over river water sharing in India. By empowering the central government to set up tribunals with binding authority, the Act seeks to promote fairness, cooperation, and sustainable use of water resources. The Act has been instrumental in addressing some of the most complex and sensitive disputes in India’s federal system.
RELATED Blog
0 comments