The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956
The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956
Background:
The Supreme Court of India, established under Article 124 of the Indian Constitution, is the highest judicial authority in India. Article 124(1) originally provided for a Supreme Court consisting of the Chief Justice and not less than seven other judges.
However, the Constitution did not specify the exact number beyond the minimum. To provide flexibility and efficiency in the functioning of the Supreme Court, Parliament enacted The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956 to regulate and increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court.
Objective:
To empower the Central Government to increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court beyond the minimum prescribed by the Constitution.
To facilitate the efficient disposal of cases by allowing more judges to be appointed.
To ensure flexibility in the composition and strength of the Supreme Court.
Key Provisions:
1. Power to Increase the Number of Judges (Section 1)
The Act authorizes the Central Government to increase the number of judges of the Supreme Court beyond the minimum of seven other than the Chief Justice.
The government may increase the strength up to a maximum number as may be prescribed.
This increase is done by notification in the official Gazette.
2. Effect on Existing Judges
The Act does not affect the terms or conditions of existing judges.
It merely provides legal authority to appoint additional judges.
3. Maximum Number of Judges
Initially, the Act allowed an increase to a maximum of 11 judges (including the Chief Justice).
Over time, amendments have raised the maximum number (currently the sanctioned strength is 34 judges).
Significance:
The Act has been critical in ensuring that the Supreme Court can handle a growing number of cases without undue delay.
By allowing the appointment of additional judges, the judicial system can better manage caseloads and backlog.
Helps maintain the efficiency and effectiveness of the apex court.
It complements Article 124(1) of the Constitution without the need for frequent constitutional amendments to change the number of judges.
Related Constitutional Provisions:
Article 124(1): Establishes the Supreme Court and mentions the minimum number of judges.
The Act provides a legislative mechanism to increase judges beyond this minimum.
Relevant Case Law:
1. In re: Supreme Court Judges (1998) 7 SCC 134
Issue: Appointment and increase of judges in the Supreme Court.
Held: The Supreme Court recognized the Central Government’s power to increase the number of judges as per the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956.
Principle: The Act is a valid exercise of legislative power to augment the strength of the Supreme Court.
2. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981) AIR 149
Issue: Independence of the judiciary and appointment of judges.
Held: While not directly about the number of judges, this landmark case emphasized the importance of safeguarding judicial independence in all appointments and expansions.
Principle: Expansion of the court must not compromise judicial independence.
3. Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (1993) 4 SCC 441
Issue: Appointment process of Supreme Court judges and its implications.
Held: While focused on appointment procedures, the case highlighted the importance of maintaining judicial standards, even when increasing the number of judges.
Principle: The Act empowers numerical expansion but judicial quality and independence must be preserved.
Summary:
The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956 provides the Central Government with the statutory authority to increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court beyond the constitutional minimum.
This flexibility helps the judiciary manage its growing workload efficiently.
The Act has been upheld as a valid legislative measure supporting the judicial system’s needs.
Courts have emphasized that any expansion must respect judicial independence and uphold the highest standards.
The Act has played a vital role in shaping the modern Supreme Court's capacity and structure.
RELATED Blog
0 comments