The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013
Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013
Introduction
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 is a landmark anti-corruption legislation enacted by the Parliament of India. The Act provides for the establishment of an independent body called the Lokpal at the central level and mandates the establishment of Lokayuktas in states to inquire into allegations of corruption against public officials.
The Act was enacted to curb corruption in government institutions by providing a statutory mechanism to investigate and prosecute corruption complaints against high-level officials, including the Prime Minister, Ministers, Members of Parliament, and public servants.
Background
The demand for a Lokpal in India had been longstanding, with multiple committees and civil society movements advocating for it.
The Jan Lokpal movement led by Anna Hazare in 2011 played a significant role in pushing for the enactment of this law.
The Act came into force in January 2014.
Objectives of the Act
To establish a Lokpal (ombudsman) at the central level for timely and effective investigation and prosecution of corruption cases.
To ensure independence and impartiality in inquiry and prosecution.
To establish Lokayuktas in states for similar purposes.
To provide a comprehensive mechanism to address corruption complaints against public officials.
To enhance transparency and accountability in governance.
Key Provisions of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013
1. Establishment of Lokpal (Section 3)
A Lokpal is constituted at the central level.
It consists of a Chairperson and up to eight members.
At least 50% of the members should be from judicial backgrounds.
The Lokpal has the power to inquire into allegations of corruption against:
Prime Minister (with some procedural safeguards)
Ministers of the Union Government
Members of Parliament
Group A, B, C officers and public servants.
2. Jurisdiction and Powers (Sections 6 - 19)
Lokpal has authority to investigate complaints related to:
Bribery, criminal misconduct, abuse of office, and misuse of public power.
It has powers equivalent to a civil court during inquiries.
The Lokpal can initiate inquiries suo moto or based on complaints.
It can direct investigation agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate.
The Lokpal can prosecute offenders based on findings.
3. Procedure for Inquiry and Investigation (Sections 17-19)
The Lokpal follows a procedure for registering complaints, preliminary inquiry, and formal investigation.
It ensures confidentiality and protection of whistleblowers.
Timelines are specified for completing inquiries and investigations.
4. Lokayuktas in States (Section 61)
States are required to establish Lokayuktas and other authorities for inquiries into corruption at the state level.
The Act prescribes the framework but leaves details to state governments.
Lokayuktas perform functions similar to the Lokpal for state government officials.
5. Other Important Provisions
Protection of informers and whistleblowers (Section 19).
Appointment procedures ensure transparency and independence.
Annual reports on performance must be submitted to Parliament.
Offenses like false complaints are punishable.
Significance of the Act
Provides an independent watchdog for combating corruption at the highest levels.
Fills the gap left by previous anti-corruption laws.
Strengthens democratic governance by making public servants accountable.
Encourages public participation and transparency.
Protects whistleblowers and encourages reporting of corruption.
Relevant Case Law and Judicial Principles
1. Supreme Court’s Role in Enforcing the Lokpal
In Center for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) v. Union of India (2013), the Supreme Court emphasized the need for a Lokpal and held that the government must ensure a strong and effective anti-corruption mechanism.
The Court supported the enactment of the Lokpal Act and stressed effective implementation to curb corruption.
2. Constitutional Validity
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act has been upheld as a valid exercise of the Parliament’s legislative power under Entry 82 and Entry 45 of List I (Union List) of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, relating to public order and services.
In various writ petitions, courts have recognized that establishing an independent anti-corruption authority is within legislative competence and crucial for enforcing fundamental rights like the right to clean governance (Article 21).
3. Jurisdiction Over the Prime Minister
The Act includes special safeguards before initiating inquiries against the Prime Minister, reflecting the delicate balance between accountability and the functioning of executive power.
Courts have recognized that while the PM is not above law, the process must be fair to protect executive functions (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain, 1975).
4. Role of the Lokpal in Investigations
The Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) laid down guidelines to prevent misuse of investigation agencies like the CBI.
The Lokpal’s power to direct investigations must be exercised judiciously and without political bias.
5. Whistleblower Protection
In Common Cause v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court highlighted the importance of protecting whistleblowers for effective anti-corruption enforcement.
The Lokpal Act’s provisions on whistleblower protection find judicial backing in ensuring safe reporting of corruption.
Summary
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013:
Establishes an independent body to investigate and prosecute corruption at the central and state levels.
Covers high-level officials including the PM, Ministers, MPs, and public servants.
Provides procedural safeguards for fair investigation.
Mandates protection of whistleblowers.
Strengthens the anti-corruption framework in India.
Is supported by constitutional and judicial principles affirming its validity and importance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments