Uberrima fides (sometimes uberrimae fidei) – Utmost good faith.
Uberrima Fides (Utmost Good Faith)
Meaning:
Uberrima Fides is a Latin term meaning “utmost good faith.”
It is a legal doctrine requiring parties to act honestly and disclose all material facts to one another.
This principle is especially important in insurance contracts but also applies to other contracts where one party has more information than the other.
Why is Uberrima Fides Important?
Insurance contracts involve asymmetric information — the insured knows more about the risk than the insurer.
The insurer relies on the information given to decide whether to accept the risk and on what terms.
If the insured hides or misrepresents facts, it can lead to unfair loss for the insurer.
Application in Law:
Parties must disclose all material facts honestly, even if not asked directly.
Failure to disclose or misrepresentation can make the contract voidable or lead to denial of claims.
It goes beyond mere honesty; it demands full and frank disclosure.
Key Features:
| Feature | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Applies mostly to | Insurance contracts, fiduciary relationships. |
| Requires disclosure of | All material facts affecting the contract. |
| Consequence of breach | Contract may be voidable, claim rejected. |
| Nature | Imposes a duty on both parties but stricter on the insured. |
Case Laws:
1. Carter v. Boehm (1766)
The classic and foundational case where Lord Mansfield defined Uberrima Fides in insurance contracts.
Facts: Carter insured a fort but did not disclose its vulnerable position.
Held: The insured must disclose all material facts affecting the risk.
Principle: “Uberrimae fidei obligatio est,” meaning the contract of insurance is one of utmost good faith.
2. Kandhari v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
The insured did not disclose previous health issues while taking health insurance.
Held: Non-disclosure amounted to breach of uberrima fides.
Insurance company was justified in repudiating the claim.
3. Fisher v. Phelps (1869)
An insurance claim was denied because the insured concealed material facts.
Reinforced the principle that non-disclosure can void the contract.
Difference Between Uberrima Fides and Caveat Emptor:
| Uberrima Fides | Caveat Emptor (“Let the buyer beware”) |
|---|---|
| Requires full disclosure by both parties | Buyer must beware; seller not necessarily obliged to disclose |
| Applied in contracts with unequal knowledge (e.g., insurance) | General commercial transactions |
| Focus on good faith and transparency | Focus on buyer’s responsibility to check |
Summary:
Uberrima fides imposes a special duty of disclosure beyond ordinary contracts.
Primarily governs insurance contracts, ensuring fairness.
Breach leads to voidance or denial of claims.
Key cases like Carter v. Boehm shaped this doctrine.
RELATED Blog
0 comments