Law of Evidence at Syria
Syria’s legal system is influenced by civil law, with historical ties to both French and Ottoman law. The Law of Evidence in Syria is governed by a combination of statutory law (particularly the Code of Civil Procedure), Islamic law (Sharia) in certain cases, and other legal practices. Syrian law incorporates elements of civil law traditions as well as specific provisions under Syrian legislation.
Key Aspects of the Law of Evidence in Syria:
Civil Law Influence:
Syria's legal system is predominantly influenced by civil law, particularly the French Civil Code, which was introduced during the French Mandate period (1920-1946).
The Syrian Civil Code and Code of Civil Procedure govern most of the rules regarding the admission and use of evidence in civil matters. The rules are codified and tend to be written statutes rather than based on judicial precedents, in line with civil law traditions.
Types of Evidence:
Documentary Evidence: Written documents are considered one of the most reliable types of evidence in Syrian law. These documents must generally be authentic and legally recognized to be admissible in court.
Oral Testimony: Witness testimony is an important form of evidence, although it is generally subordinated to written evidence. Witnesses in Syria are required to testify under oath, and their credibility may be challenged by the opposing party.
Physical Evidence: Items of tangible proof (e.g., objects, materials, etc.) can be presented in court as evidence. However, they must be properly identified and linked to the case in order to be admissible.
Expert Evidence: Expert witnesses may be used in cases that require specialized knowledge. Experts can be appointed by the court to assist in matters such as technical analysis or medical opinions.
Presumptions: Syrian law recognizes certain legal presumptions, which allow the court to infer certain facts based on established circumstances. For instance, if a person is found in possession of stolen property, the law might presume that they are the thief unless they can prove otherwise.
Hearsay Rule:
As in most civil law systems, hearsay evidence (testimony about what someone else said outside of court) is generally inadmissible in Syria. The rationale is that the credibility of the source of the information cannot be verified in court.
However, there are exceptions to the hearsay rule in Syrian law. For example, statements made in specific contexts such as dying declarations or business records may be admissible.
Burden of Proof:
In civil cases, the plaintiff or the party bringing the case carries the burden of proof. The standard of proof is typically the balance of probabilities (i.e., the claimant must prove that their version of events is more likely than not).
In criminal cases, the prosecution has the burden of proving the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
Criminal Law:
In criminal cases, evidence is governed by the Syrian Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code. Evidence in criminal cases includes physical evidence, witness testimony, expert opinions, and confessions. The court will evaluate the weight and credibility of the evidence before making a decision.
Confessions are treated with caution. A confession must be voluntary and not coerced. The Syrian legal system provides safeguards against torture and inhumane treatment during investigations.
Islamic Law (Sharia):
For certain family law and inheritance matters, Islamic law (Sharia) plays a significant role in Syria. Evidence in such cases may include oral testimony, witnesses, and documents. The standards of evidence in Sharia law may differ from those in the civil law system and could include more emphasis on witness testimony.
Sharia courts in Syria handle family-related matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and custody, and the rules of evidence in these matters may include principles based on Islamic jurisprudence.
Electronic Evidence:
Digital and electronic evidence (such as emails, text messages, and social media posts) is becoming increasingly important in Syrian courts. The rules of evidence regarding electronic records are still evolving, but the authenticity and chain of custody are essential to establish the admissibility of such evidence.
Syrian courts may require expert testimony to confirm the integrity of electronic evidence.
Judicial Discretion:
Judges in Syria have considerable discretion in evaluating the relevance and weight of evidence presented in court. Unlike in the common law system, where strict rules of evidence may apply, judges in Syria have a more flexible approach to assessing the credibility of evidence, especially where there is a lack of direct documentary proof.
Appeals:
Appeals in Syria are heard by the Court of Appeal, and in some cases, further appeals can be made to the Supreme Court. Appellate courts have the authority to review both the facts and the legal issues related to evidence.
Court System:
The Syrian court system is divided into several levels:
Primary Courts (First Instance): Handle the initial trials for civil and criminal cases.
Appeal Courts: Review cases that have been appealed from the lower courts.
Supreme Court: The highest court, which has the final say on legal matters, including issues related to evidence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments