The Scope and Limits of Attorney Authority under Professional Responsibility
📘 Scope and Limits of Attorney Authority under Professional Responsibility
✅ 1. Scope of Attorney Authority
An attorney acts as an agent of the client, and the attorney-client relationship is governed by principles of agency law as well as ethical duties under professional responsibility.
Attorney authority is generally divided into two types:
🔹 A. Actual Authority
i. Express Authority
This is the authority explicitly granted by the client to the attorney.
Includes things like filing lawsuits, making legal arguments, and appearing in court.
ii. Implied Authority
Authority necessary to carry out the express authority.
For example, if an attorney is hired to litigate a case, they are impliedly authorized to:
File motions,
Conduct discovery,
Communicate with opposing counsel.
🔹 B. Apparent Authority
Occurs when a third party reasonably believes that the attorney has authority, based on the client's conduct or the attorney’s role.
May bind the client even if no actual authority was given — but this can raise ethical and legal disputes.
🔹 C. Inherent Authority
Courts may recognize an attorney’s authority in limited circumstances even if not expressly granted — to preserve judicial integrity or efficient proceedings.
❌ 2. Limits of Attorney Authority
Despite the broad powers given, attorneys cannot act without client consent on matters that significantly affect the client's substantive rights.
🔺 A. Decisions Reserved for the Client
Settling a case
Pleading guilty in a criminal case
Waiving the right to a jury trial
Testifying in one's own defense
Appealing a decision
Attorneys must consult and obtain informed consent from the client before taking such steps.
🔺 B. Ethical Limits
Attorneys are bound by rules of professional conduct, and cannot:
Act against the client’s interest
Make material misrepresentations
Withhold information the client needs to make informed decisions
Act without authority in settlement or major decisions
📚 Relevant Case Law
🧑⚖️ 1. Nichols v. Keller, 15 Cal. App. 4th 1672 (1993)
Facts: Attorney failed to inform client of all potential remedies, including a third-party tort claim, while handling a worker's compensation case.
Issue: Did the attorney breach their professional responsibilities?
Holding: Yes. The attorney had a duty to fully inform the client of all legal options, even beyond the immediate case.
Significance: Shows that attorney authority is not just about doing what the client says, but also about informing the client so they can make proper decisions.
🧑⚖️ 2. In re Gatti, 330 Or. 517 (2000)
Facts: An attorney misrepresented his identity during an investigation to gather evidence.
Issue: Can an attorney engage in deception for the purpose of legal investigation?
Holding: No. Even under a claim of implied authority, attorneys cannot violate ethical rules, including truthfulness.
Significance: Authority has clear ethical limits — even in service of client interests, lawyers cannot lie or deceive.
🧑⚖️ 3. Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 (1983)
Facts: A criminal defendant wanted certain issues raised on appeal, but his court-appointed attorney declined to raise all of them.
Issue: Is the attorney required to raise every issue the client requests?
Holding: No. Attorneys have discretion over legal strategy on appeal.
Significance: While major decisions belong to the client, tactical or procedural decisions are often left to the attorney.
🧑⚖️ 4. In re Marriage of Hasso, 229 Cal. App. 3d 1174 (1991)
Facts: An attorney settled a case without the client's consent.
Issue: Was the settlement binding?
Holding: No. The attorney had no authority to settle without express client consent.
Significance: Reinforces that settlement authority rests solely with the client.
🔎 Summary Table
| Type of Authority | Definition | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Express Authority | Clearly given by the client | Filing a lawsuit, handling negotiations |
| Implied Authority | Necessary to carry out express authority | Conducting discovery, contacting witnesses |
| Apparent Authority | Perceived authority based on client or attorney conduct | Opposing counsel believing attorney can settle |
| Inherent Authority | Court-recognized authority for procedural efficiency | Minor courtroom decisions |
| Client’s Reserved Rights | Attorney's Authority (with Limits) |
|---|---|
| Decide whether to settle | Conduct litigation strategy |
| Plead guilty or not in criminal case | File motions or legal arguments |
| Waive trial rights | Choose order of witnesses |
| Testify in own defense | Manage communication with opposing counsel |
⚖️ Key Takeaways
Attorneys are agents, but not dictators — they must act within the scope of authority.
Major decisions (like settling or pleading guilty) require explicit client approval.
Attorneys must inform, consult, and obtain informed consent for key decisions.
Ethical obligations and professional responsibility override any claim of authority.
Courts will not uphold actions taken without authority in areas reserved for client control.
RELATED Blog
0 comments