The Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) (Extension to Jammu and Kashmir) Act, 1973

The Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) (Extension to Jammu and Kashmir) Act, 1973

Overview:

This Act extends the provisions related to the oaths and fees for diplomatic and consular officers to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It specifically applies the central laws regarding the oath-taking and fees of diplomatic and consular officers within Jammu and Kashmir, which earlier had special constitutional status under Article 370 (prior to 2019 changes).

Key Points:

The Act was enacted in 1973.

It aims to bring uniformity by extending central provisions related to diplomatic and consular officers to Jammu and Kashmir.

It ensures that diplomatic and consular officers appointed under the Indian government take prescribed oaths and pay fees in accordance with central laws.

This extension was necessary because Jammu and Kashmir had its own laws, and central laws didn’t apply automatically due to special status.

The Act does not change the content of oaths or fee structures but applies them to J&K.

Significance:

It facilitated smoother functioning of diplomatic and consular officers in Jammu and Kashmir.

Ensured the Indian government’s laws related to diplomatic protocols were uniformly implemented.

Highlighted the legislative relationship between Jammu and Kashmir and the Indian Union before the abrogation of Article 370.

Summary Table

AspectDetails
Act NameDiplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) (Extension to Jammu and Kashmir) Act, 1973
Year of Enactment1973
PurposeTo extend central provisions on oaths and fees of diplomatic and consular officers to Jammu and Kashmir
ApplicabilityJammu and Kashmir State
Key ProvisionsOaths and fee payments by diplomatic and consular officers as per central laws
Reason for EnactmentJammu and Kashmir’s special status meant central laws did not apply automatically
EffectUniform application of diplomatic and consular laws in Jammu and Kashmir
SignificanceImproved administrative consistency and diplomatic protocol enforcement

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments