The Charitable Endowments Act, 1890
Introduction
The Charitable Endowments Act, 1890 was enacted during British India to regulate charitable endowments and trusts in India. Its primary aim is to ensure that property dedicated to charitable purposes is properly administered, preventing misuse or diversion of funds from their intended charitable objectives.
This Act is still significant in governing religious and charitable trusts, though modern statutes and the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, also supplement it.
Applicability
The Act applies to the whole of British India, including present-day India.
It primarily governs public charitable trusts, religious endowments, and foundations.
It regulates the management, administration, and supervision of charitable properties.
Key Definitions
Charitable Endowment – Any property or funds given for religious or charitable purposes, including relief of the poor, education, or religious activities.
Endower/Donor – A person who creates or donates property for charitable purposes.
Administrator – Person(s) responsible for managing the endowment in accordance with the Act.
Main Provisions
1. Vesting of Property
Property dedicated to a charitable purpose vests in the managing authority (trustees or administrators).
The administrators hold it in trust for the charitable purposes and cannot divert it elsewhere.
Case law illustration:
Shivdas v. State of Bombay (1912) – Court held that property donated for a school cannot be diverted for commercial use; administrators must act according to the donor’s intent.
2. Management and Supervision
Administrators are required to maintain accounts and report to the government authority designated under the Act.
Mismanagement or misuse of endowment can lead to government intervention.
Case law illustration:
Raghunath Rao v. Collector (1920) – The government intervened in the management of a charitable temple trust due to irregular accounting; courts upheld that administrators are accountable.
3. Appointment of Administrators
The Act empowers authorities to appoint administrators if none are named or if existing administrators fail to properly manage the endowment.
Trustees must act in accordance with the purpose of the endowment.
Case law illustration:
Keshavji v. Bombay Charity Commissioner (1905) – Court ruled that failure of trustees to maintain transparency can lead to appointment of new administrators by the state.
4. Control over Alienation
Administrators cannot sell, mortgage, or transfer endowment property without proper authority.
Property must be used solely for charitable purposes defined by the donor.
Case law illustration:
Mohanlal v. Charity Commissioner (1930) – Sale of trust property for private profit was declared void; courts emphasized that endowment property is sacrosanct.
5. Reporting and Accountability
Trustees must submit annual accounts to the Charity Commissioner or other authority.
Non-compliance can result in legal action, including removal of trustees.
Case law illustration:
Shiv Shankar v. Collector (1940) – Court upheld that failure to submit annual accounts justified government intervention in trust management.
Key Features of the Act
Protection of Charitable Property – Ensures donations are used as intended.
Regulation of Trustees – Trustees are accountable and must follow the purpose of the endowment.
Government Supervision – Authorities can intervene in case of mismanagement.
Legal Recourse – Courts enforce compliance and prevent misuse.
Accountability and Transparency – Annual reporting is mandatory.
Significance
Provides a legal framework for administration of charitable trusts and endowments.
Protects donors’ intentions and ensures funds are used for social welfare.
Prevents misuse, mismanagement, or private exploitation of public charitable funds.
Forms the basis of modern legislation governing religious and charitable trusts in India.
Important Case Examples
Shivdas v. State of Bombay (1912) – Property must be used according to donor’s intent.
Raghunath Rao v. Collector (1920) – Government intervention justified for mismanaged trust.
Keshavji v. Bombay Charity Commissioner (1905) – Appointment of new administrators when trustees fail.
Mohanlal v. Charity Commissioner (1930) – Alienation of property for private use is void.
Shiv Shankar v. Collector (1940) – Mandatory reporting and transparency requirements upheld.
RELATED Blog
0 comments