Kerala HC Demands Review of Police Handling of Protests
- ByAdmin --
- 02 Jun 2025 --
- 0 Comments
The Kerala High Court’s recent demand for a comprehensive review of police conduct during protests underscores the importance of safeguarding democratic principles while maintaining public order. This directive highlights the balance between constitutional rights and state responsibility.
Context and Background
Protests have long been a cornerstone of democratic expression in India. They provide citizens with a platform to voice grievances and influence policy decisions. However, instances of disproportionate police action during protests have raised concerns about the infringement of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India.
In Kerala, the handling of protests has come under judicial scrutiny following allegations of excessive force, arbitrary arrests, and violations of procedural safeguards. These issues prompted the Kerala High Court to intervene, signaling a need for systemic reforms.
Key Constitutional and Legal Provisions
The High Court’s observations resonate with several constitutional and legal principles, including:
- Article 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b): These provisions guarantee the right to freedom of speech and expression and the right to assemble peacefully without arms. Police actions that suppress these rights must withstand the test of reasonableness under Article 19(2).
- Article 21: Protecting the right to life and personal liberty, this article underscores the importance of humane treatment during arrests and detentions.
- Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973: Sections 129 to 132 of the CrPC outline the use of force by police during protests, emphasizing that it must be proportional and necessary.
- The Police Act, 1861: This act mandates police conduct to uphold the law while respecting citizens' rights.
High Court’s Observations
The Kerala High Court expressed concerns over:
- Excessive Use of Force: Allegations of lathi charges and tear gas use during peaceful demonstrations were highlighted. The court reiterated the need for minimal force.
- Violation of Due Process: Arbitrary arrests and detentions without proper documentation violate established legal procedures.
- Need for Accountability: The absence of independent oversight mechanisms to review police conduct during protests.
- Training and Sensitization: The lack of adequate training in crowd management and human rights for law enforcement personnel.
Recommendations by the Court
The High Court proposed several measures to address these issues:
- Implementation of Guidelines: Strict adherence to the Supreme Court’s guidelines in DK Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997), which mandate procedural safeguards during arrests and detentions.
- Formation of Oversight Committees: Establish independent bodies to monitor police actions and address grievances.
- Enhanced Training Programs: Regular training in non-violent crowd control techniques and human rights principles.
- Use of Technology: Deployment of body cameras and other surveillance tools to ensure accountability during protests.
Implications for Governance
The Kerala High Court’s intervention serves as a reminder that the state’s duty to maintain public order must align with its obligation to protect constitutional rights. This balance is critical to fostering trust between citizens and law enforcement agencies.
Conclusion
The Kerala High Court’s demand for a review of police handling of protests is a pivotal step toward ensuring justice and accountability. It underscores the judiciary’s role as a guardian of constitutional rights and sets a precedent for other states. By implementing the court’s recommendations, Kerala can lead the way in establishing a humane and lawful approach to managing public demonstrations.
RELATED Blog
0 comments