The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
📖 Introduction
The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was enacted by the Indian Parliament to prevent atrocities and crimes against members of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).
Historically, SCs and STs faced severe social discrimination, untouchability, violence, and humiliation. Existing laws like the Indian Penal Code (IPC) were not sufficient to protect them. Hence, a special legislation was introduced.
⚖️ Objectives of the Act
To prevent atrocities against SCs and STs.
To provide special courts for speedy trials.
To ensure strict punishment for offenders.
To provide relief and rehabilitation to victims.
To remove the feeling of fear and insecurity among SC/ST communities.
📑 Key Provisions of the Act
1. Definition of Atrocity (Section 3)
The Act lists specific acts as atrocities if committed by non-SCs/STs against SC/STs, such as:
Forcing them to eat inedible substances.
Parading them naked, humiliating them publicly.
Wrongfully occupying their land.
Denying access to public places (temples, wells, etc.).
Social boycotts or intimidation.
Sexual assault against SC/ST women.
2. Punishments
Minimum 6 months to maximum life imprisonment for atrocities.
Certain crimes are non-bailable and cognizable (police can arrest without warrant).
3. Special Courts (Section 14)
State governments must set up Special Courts to ensure speedy trial.
Special Public Prosecutors are appointed for effective prosecution.
4. Relief and Rehabilitation (Section 15A & Rules, 1995)
Victims and their families get compensation, protection, and rehabilitation.
Financial help, employment support, and security are provided.
5. Preventive Measures
State governments are duty-bound to take measures to prevent atrocities.
If public servants neglect their duty, they can also be punished under this Act.
🏛️ Important Case Laws
1. State of M.P. v. Ram Krishna Balothia (1995, SC)
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Act.
Held that anticipatory bail (Section 438 CrPC) is not applicable for offences under this Act because of the seriousness of atrocities.
2. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra (2018, SC)
SC introduced safeguards against misuse:
Preliminary inquiry before arrest.
Approval of appointing authority before prosecuting a government officer.
This judgment was criticized as it diluted the Act.
3. Union of India v. State of Maharashtra (2019, SC)
Parliament amended the Act (2018 Amendment) to nullify the above judgment.
SC upheld the Amendment, restoring strict provisions:
No preliminary inquiry needed.
Immediate arrest allowed.
No anticipatory bail for accused.
4. Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India (2020, SC)
SC upheld the constitutional validity of the 2018 Amendment.
However, it clarified that courts can still grant anticipatory bail in exceptional cases if the complaint is found to be prima facie false.
5. Khuman Singh v. State of M.P. (2019, SC)
SC held that to convict under the Act, intention to humiliate a person on account of caste identity must be proved.
Mere abusive language without caste reference is not enough.
📌 Importance of the Act
Provides special protection to historically marginalized groups.
Acts as a deterrent against caste-based crimes.
Recognizes atrocities as not just individual crimes, but social evils.
Ensures speedy justice through special courts.
Empowers victims with rehabilitation and compensation.
✅ In Summary:
The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is a powerful social legislation aimed at protecting Dalits and Tribals from atrocities, discrimination, and violence. Courts have interpreted it strictly to protect victims, but also ensured that it is not misused.
RELATED Blog
0 comments