Legal Update: Recent Clarifications on ESOP Taxation and Employee Rights in India
- ByAdmin --
- 23 May 2025 --
- 0 Comments
Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) have become an essential part of compensation packages in India, especially in startups and technology firms. Recent regulatory updates and judicial rulings have provided significant clarity on the taxation of ESOPs and the rights of employees holding these options.
Regulatory Framework: SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits and Sweat Equity) Regulations, 2021
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) consolidated its earlier regulations relating to employee stock options and sweat equity into the SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits and Sweat Equity) Regulations, 2021. Key aspects of this regulatory framework include:
- Expanded Definition of Employee: The definition now covers non-permanent employees who work exclusively for the company, including probationary and fixed-term contract employees. This broadening ensures wider coverage of ESOP benefits.
- Relaxation on Vesting Period: In cases such as the death or permanent disability of an employee, the mandatory minimum vesting period of one year can be waived to allow immediate vesting of options.
- Cashless Exercise Mechanism: The regulations introduce a “Sell to Cover” mechanism, allowing employees to sell a portion of their vested shares to cover the exercise price and applicable taxes, easing the financial burden at the time of exercise.
Employee Rights under ESOPs
Employees granted ESOPs have specific rights and protections, including:
- Vesting Rights: Options typically vest over a predetermined period, commonly a minimum of one year.
- Exercise Rights: Employees can exercise their vested options within the specified exercise period defined in the ESOP scheme.
- Transfer Restrictions: ESOPs are generally non-transferable and cannot be pledged or sold, ensuring they remain a benefit tied to the employee.
- Rights of Legal Heirs: In the unfortunate event of an employee’s death, all vested options automatically vest in their legal heirs or nominees, providing continuity of benefits.
Taxation of ESOPs: Income Tax Act, 1961
The tax treatment of ESOPs is governed primarily under the Income Tax Act, 1961, with the following key provisions:
- Taxation at Exercise: The difference between the fair market value (FMV) of the shares on the date of exercise and the exercise price paid by the employee is treated as a perquisite under Section 17(2)(vi). This perquisite amount is taxable as salary income.
- Taxation at Sale: When the employee sells the shares, capital gains tax applies. If the holding period is less than 24 months, the gains are classified as short-term capital gains; if held longer, as long-term capital gains.
A significant judicial clarification came from the Delhi High Court, which ruled that compensation paid by Flipkart for the loss in value of ESOPs (due to disinvestment) was not taxable as a perquisite since the options had not been exercised. This decision provided relief on taxability before exercise.
SEBI’s Enforcement and Recent Settlements
In a notable enforcement action, SEBI found that Vijay Shekhar Sharma, founder of Paytm, violated regulations by receiving 21 million ESOPs despite holding a promoter stake exceeding permissible limits. SEBI regulations prohibit large shareholders (promoters) from receiving ESOPs to avoid conflicts of interest. Sharma had reduced his stake from 14.7% to 9.1% prior to Paytm’s 2021 IPO to qualify for ESOPs.
Following SEBI’s intervention, Sharma relinquished the ESOPs, and both he and Paytm paid penalties of ₹11.1 million each, underscoring the regulator’s strict stance on compliance.
Proposed Regulatory Reforms
SEBI is considering amendments aimed at addressing concerns related to founders and promoters of companies planning an IPO:
- Eligibility of Founders Post-Promoter Classification: Founders classified as promoters at IPO time may still hold and exercise ESOPs granted at least one year before the IPO, subject to specified conditions. This helps maintain founder incentives without regulatory breaches.
- Cooling-Off Period: A proposed one-year cooling-off period between ESOP grants and IPO announcements is intended to prevent potential misuse of ESOP grants immediately preceding public offerings.
Conclusion
The regulatory and judicial clarifications on ESOP taxation and employee rights reflect an evolving landscape aiming to strike a balance between encouraging employee participation in equity and ensuring regulatory compliance. Both companies and employees must stay abreast of these developments to effectively manage ESOP schemes while safeguarding their interests.
RELATED Blog
0 comments