Insolvency Law at Senegal
In Senegal, insolvency law is governed by the OHADA Uniform Act on Insolvency Procedures (Acte uniforme relatif aux procédures collectives d’insolvabilité), which applies to 16 member states of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA), including Senegal. The OHADA system is designed to harmonize business law across West and Central Africa, providing a common legal framework for commercial transactions, insolvency procedures, and dispute resolution.
Senegal's insolvency procedures are therefore governed by the OHADA Uniform Act, which came into effect in 2015 and aims to modernize the insolvency process, promote economic recovery, and protect creditors while also giving distressed companies a chance to reorganize and avoid liquidation when possible.
Key Legislation
OHADA Uniform Act on Insolvency Procedures (2015): This is the core legislation governing insolvency in Senegal. It defines the processes for both corporate and individual insolvency, including liquidation, restructuring, and the roles of different stakeholders in the insolvency process.
The Civil Code and Commercial Code of Senegal: These provide general commercial law provisions that may interact with the OHADA Insolvency procedures, particularly in matters related to contracts and debtor-creditor relations.
Types of Insolvency Procedures in Senegal (Under OHADA Law)
The OHADA Insolvency Act provides two broad types of insolvency procedures:
Preventive Procedures (Prevention of Insolvency)
Collective Procedures (Insolvency and Liquidation)
1. Preventive Procedures
i. Preventive Composition (Composition Préventive)
Purpose: This procedure is designed for businesses facing financial difficulties but not yet insolvent. It aims to prevent a company from falling into insolvency by allowing it to reach an agreement with creditors before liquidation becomes necessary.
Initiation: The debtor or creditors can request the court to initiate a preventive composition procedure.
Process: A mediator (called a “mandataire”) is appointed to help the company negotiate a debt restructuring plan with its creditors. The goal is to agree on a debt payment plan that allows the company to continue operations.
Outcome: If the debtor and creditors reach an agreement, the company may be allowed to continue operations under a modified debt structure. If no agreement is reached, the company may proceed to a collective insolvency procedure.
2. Collective Procedures (Insolvency and Liquidation)
i. Judicial Reorganization (Redressement Judiciaire)
Purpose: Judicial reorganization is a procedure for businesses that are insolvent but still have a chance of recovery. The aim is to allow the company to reorganize its operations, restructure its debts, and continue operating.
Initiation: The debtor or creditors file a petition with the court to initiate judicial reorganization.
Process:
A judicial administrator is appointed to oversee the reorganization process.
The company is granted a moratorium (suspension of legal actions by creditors) to give it time to reorganize.
The debtor presents a reorganization plan, which must be approved by creditors and the court. The plan typically involves rescheduling debt payments, reducing debt amounts, or renegotiating terms.
Outcome: If the reorganization plan is successfully implemented, the company continues operations, and creditors are paid according to the new terms. If the company cannot reorganize successfully, it may be forced into liquidation.
ii. Judicial Liquidation (Liquidation Judiciaire)
Purpose: Judicial liquidation is used when a company is insolvent and cannot be saved through reorganization. It involves the sale of the company’s assets to pay off creditors.
Initiation: This procedure is initiated when the court determines that the company is beyond recovery, typically when it cannot meet its financial obligations.
Process:
The court appoints a liquidator who is responsible for selling the company's assets and distributing the proceeds among creditors.
The liquidator also handles the dissolution of the company and ensures that the liquidation process complies with legal requirements.
Outcome: After the assets are liquidated and the proceeds are distributed to creditors, the company is dissolved. Any remaining debts are typically written off if there are insufficient assets to pay all creditors.
3. Individual Insolvency Procedures
Senegal, through the OHADA Uniform Act, primarily focuses on corporate insolvency, as individual insolvency is less common in the region. However, individual debtors may be subject to personal bankruptcy procedures under the broader framework, particularly if they are involved in business activities or if personal debts reach the point of insolvency.
Priority of Claims in Insolvency
The OHADA Uniform Act outlines the priority of claims in insolvency proceedings, which follows a standard order:
Judicial and Administrative Costs: The costs of the insolvency process (e.g., court fees, liquidator fees) take priority.
Employees: Unpaid wages, social security contributions, and other employee-related claims are prioritized.
Secured Creditors: Creditors holding security interests (e.g., mortgage, pledge, lien) on the debtor's assets.
Unsecured Creditors: These include suppliers, trade creditors, and other unsecured creditors.
Shareholders: Any remaining funds after the above claims are satisfied are distributed to shareholders.
Key Features of Senegal’s Insolvency Law
Emphasis on Business Recovery: The OHADA Insolvency Act places a strong emphasis on rescuing businesses through reorganization procedures. This approach encourages economic recovery by allowing viable businesses to restructure rather than immediately resorting to liquidation.
Court Oversight: Insolvency procedures in Senegal are overseen by the court, which appoints administrators, approves reorganization plans, and monitors liquidation processes.
Moratorium for Restructuring: One of the key features of the reorganization process is a moratorium (temporary halt on creditor actions), which allows companies to restructure without the immediate pressure of creditors taking legal actions.
Transparency and Protection for Creditors: While the law aims to rehabilitate businesses, it also protects the rights of creditors through a structured and transparent process. Creditors are involved in approving reorganization plans and are paid in accordance with the priority rules.
Encouragement of Early Intervention: Senegal’s insolvency law encourages early intervention by distressed companies, offering them the chance to negotiate with creditors before the situation deteriorates into full insolvency.
Challenges and Developments
Legal and Administrative Complexity: While the OHADA Uniform Act provides a standardized framework, there can be challenges in implementing the law in practice due to the complexity of legal procedures and the need for qualified professionals such as judicial administrators and liquidators.
Lack of Awareness: Businesses, particularly small and medium enterprises (SMEs), may lack awareness of the insolvency options available to them, leading to delays in filing for protection or reorganization.
Economic Challenges: Senegal, like many countries in the region, faces economic challenges that may make it difficult for businesses to successfully reorganize. Factors such as access to credit, market conditions, and regulatory hurdles may affect the success of restructuring efforts.
Cultural Factors: In some cases, the stigma associated with insolvency or bankruptcy in Senegal might discourage companies from initiating procedures early enough to prevent liquidation.
Conclusion
Senegal’s insolvency framework, through the OHADA Uniform Act on Insolvency Procedures, provides a clear and structured approach for managing corporate insolvency. The system emphasizes business recovery, offering a range of options including preventive composition, judicial reorganization, and liquidation. While designed to protect creditors and allow businesses a chance to recover, the system also aims to ensure an orderly distribution of assets when liquidation becomes necessary.
RELATED Blog
0 comments