Calcutta HC Seeks Transparency in Selection of Public Prosecutors
- ByAdmin --
- 31 May 2025 --
- 0 Comments
The Calcutta High Court recently emphasized the need for greater transparency in the appointment of public prosecutors (PPs). Recognizing the pivotal role that public prosecutors play in the administration of justice, the court’s observations have brought to light critical issues surrounding their selection process. This article explores the concerns raised, relevant legal provisions, and the implications of ensuring transparency in such appointments.
Role of Public Prosecutors in Justice Delivery
Public prosecutors serve as the representatives of the state in criminal trials, ensuring the prosecution of offenders while upholding the principles of fairness and justice. Their duties include:
- Ensuring Fair Trials: Acting as impartial officers of the court to assist in the delivery of justice.
- Legal Representation: Representing the state in criminal proceedings to protect public interest.
- Upholding the Rule of Law: Balancing the rights of victims and accused persons to ensure procedural fairness.
Given their significant influence over criminal justice outcomes, the selection process for PPs warrants transparency and merit-based assessment.
Legal Framework Governing Public Prosecutors' Appointment
Section 24, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Sub-section (1) mandates that public prosecutors and additional public prosecutors for the High Court shall be appointed by the state government.
- Sub-section (4) requires consultation with the High Court in appointing district-level PPs.
Article 14, Constitution of India
- Guarantees the right to equality before the law, ensuring appointments are free from bias and favoritism.
Article 309, Constitution of India
- Empowers the legislature to regulate conditions of service, ensuring accountability in public office appointments.
The lack of transparent criteria and instances of political influence have raised questions about adherence to these provisions.
Concerns Highlighted by the Calcutta HC
- Politicization of Appointments: The court expressed concerns about potential political interference overshadowing merit.
- Lack of Defined Criteria: Absence of standardized guidelines for evaluating candidates’ qualifications and suitability.
- Impact on Justice Delivery: The selection of underqualified or biased individuals undermines public trust in the judicial system.
Recommendations for Ensuring Transparency
To address the issues raised by the Calcutta HC, the following measures are suggested:
1. Merit-Based Selection Process
- Establish clear and objective eligibility criteria for candidates, including educational qualifications, legal experience, and professional conduct.
2. Independent Screening Committees
- Form independent panels comprising judicial officers, senior advocates, and legal experts to oversee the selection process.
3. Consultation with Judiciary
- Strengthen the statutory requirement of judicial consultation under Section 24 of the CrPC to ensure a balanced and fair appointment process.
4. Public Disclosure of Appointments
- Publish the names, qualifications, and selection criteria of appointed PPs to promote accountability and public confidence.
5. Periodic Performance Reviews
- Introduce mechanisms to assess the performance of PPs to ensure continued competence and adherence to ethical standards.
Implications of Transparent Appointments
A transparent selection process for public prosecutors can have far-reaching benefits, including:
- Strengthened Justice System: Enhances the credibility and efficiency of criminal trials.
- Reduced Corruption: Limits opportunities for undue influence and favoritism.
- Increased Public Confidence: Reassures citizens of the impartiality and competence of judicial representatives.
Conclusion
The Calcutta High Court’s call for transparency in the selection of public prosecutors underscores the necessity of upholding principles of fairness and accountability in public office. Aligning the selection process with constitutional values and statutory mandates will reinforce the integrity of the justice system. Implementing the suggested reforms can pave the way for a more equitable and efficient criminal justice mechanism, reflecting the true spirit of justice as envisioned under the Indian Constitution.
RELATED Blog
0 comments