Insolvency Law at Singapore
In Singapore, insolvency law is well-developed and forms an essential part of the country’s commercial and financial legal framework. The key legislation governing insolvency in Singapore is the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act (IRDA), which came into force on July 30, 2020. This Act consolidates and modernizes various aspects of insolvency and corporate restructuring law, providing a comprehensive framework for dealing with insolvencies.
Here’s an overview of the insolvency law in Singapore:
1. Key Legislation: Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act (IRDA)
The Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act (IRDA) of 2020 is the primary legislation that governs insolvency processes in Singapore. It consolidates various previous Acts, including:
The Companies Act (for corporate insolvencies),
The Bankruptcy Act (for personal insolvencies),
The Companies (Winding Up) Rules,
The Companies (Judicial Management) Rules, and more.
The IRDA applies to both individuals and businesses and provides mechanisms for:
Liquidation (winding-up),
Judicial Management (restructuring of companies),
Bankruptcy (for individuals),
Debt Restructuring (especially for businesses).
2. Types of Insolvency Procedures
A. Corporate Insolvency
Winding Up (Liquidation)
Voluntary Winding Up: The company’s directors or shareholders pass a resolution to wind up the company. This can be either a members' voluntary winding up (where the company is solvent) or creditors' voluntary winding up (if the company is insolvent).
Compulsory Winding Up: This occurs when creditors or the company itself petition the court for the company’s liquidation. If the company is insolvent and unable to pay its debts, the court may order its dissolution.
Judicial Management
Judicial management is a process designed to help companies that are insolvent but have a reasonable chance of being rehabilitated. A judicial manager is appointed by the court to take control of the company and work on a restructuring plan.
The aim is to allow the company to continue its operations, restructure its debts, and avoid liquidation. The judicial manager must attempt to return the company to solvency.
Corporate Debt Restructuring
The IRDA also encourages corporate debt restructuring through informal negotiations or formal court procedures. It aims to provide companies with more flexibility to renegotiate their debts, even under financial distress, and avoid liquidation. The courts and the judicial manager may assist in mediating between creditors and the company.
Scheme of Arrangement
A Scheme of Arrangement is a court-approved process where a company and its creditors reach an agreement to reorganize and settle debts. It is a flexible process that allows for various debt restructuring mechanisms, such as debt forgiveness, extended payment terms, or converting debt to equity.
B. Personal Insolvency (Bankruptcy)
Bankruptcy Proceedings
Individuals who are unable to meet their debts can be declared bankrupt. Creditors may initiate bankruptcy proceedings if the individual owes more than a certain amount (typically SGD 15,000 or more).
Once a person is declared bankrupt, their assets are controlled by a Official Assignee (a government officer), who will sell the assets and distribute the proceeds to creditors. The individual may also be required to pay a portion of their income towards settling the debt.
The individual may be discharged from bankruptcy after a period (usually 3 years) if they cooperate with the Official Assignee and make reasonable efforts to repay debts.
Debt Repayment Scheme (DRS)
This is an alternative to bankruptcy for individuals who are insolvent but wish to avoid bankruptcy proceedings. Under the Debt Repayment Scheme (DRS), an individual can negotiate with creditors for a structured repayment plan, typically supervised by the official assignee.
If the individual successfully completes the repayment plan, they may be discharged from their debts.
3. Priority of Claims
In both corporate and personal insolvency cases, there is a priority order in which creditors are paid:
Secured creditors: These creditors have a claim over specific assets (e.g., mortgage lenders or those with other secured loans).
Preferential creditors: These include employees owed wages and certain government claims.
Unsecured creditors: These include suppliers, contractors, and others who don’t hold any secured interest in the company’s assets.
4. Insolvency Practitioners
Insolvency practitioners play a crucial role in the insolvency process. They can be appointed as:
Liquidators (in liquidation),
Judicial Managers (in judicial management),
Trustees in Bankruptcy (in personal insolvency cases).
These practitioners must be registered with the Singapore Insolvency and Public Trustee’s Office (IPTO) and are responsible for overseeing the liquidation, restructuring, or bankruptcy processes.
5. Restructuring and Rehabilitation
One of the key features of Singapore’s insolvency law is its focus on restructuring and rehabilitation. The country encourages business rehabilitation through:
Debt restructuring: Allows businesses to negotiate new terms with creditors to avoid bankruptcy.
Court-ordered schemes: Companies can apply for a court-approved Scheme of Arrangement to restructure debts and maintain operations.
Temporary relief for debtors: Under certain conditions, debtors can apply for a moratorium or temporary protection from creditors while they attempt to restructure.
6. Cross-Border Insolvency
Singapore is a party to the United Nations Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, which facilitates international cooperation in the insolvency of multinational companies. This law enables Singapore to recognize insolvency proceedings from other jurisdictions and coordinate the liquidation or restructuring of companies with operations in multiple countries.
7. Recent Reforms and Updates
In recent years, Singapore has implemented reforms to enhance its insolvency and restructuring laws:
The Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act (IRDA) of 2020 replaced older laws and consolidated them into a more efficient and modern system.
Singapore also introduced debtor-in-possession provisions, where directors can retain control of the company during restructuring, with oversight from the court or judicial manager.
Conclusion
Singapore’s insolvency law provides a robust and flexible framework for both corporate and personal insolvency, with an emphasis on rehabilitation, restructuring, and liquidation when necessary. It offers businesses and individuals avenues to resolve financial distress, whether through liquidation, restructuring, or debt repayment schemes.
0 comments