Difference Between Decree Holder and Holder of Decree
📘 Difference Between Decree Holder and Holder of Decree
🔹 Meaning of Terms
Term | Explanation |
---|---|
Decree Holder | A person in whose favor a decree has been passed by the court. He is the real party to the suit who obtained the decree. |
Holder of Decree | A person who is in possession of a decree but may not be the original decree-holder. This often happens when the decree-holder assigns or transfers the decree to another person. |
🔹 Detailed Explanation
1. Decree Holder
Defined in Section 2(ii) of CPC:
“Decree-holder means a person entitled to enforce a decree.”
The decree-holder is the original party for whom the court passes the decree after a suit.
He holds the right to execute the decree.
The decree-holder is usually the plaintiff who won the suit but can also be the defendant if a decree was passed in his favor.
The decree-holder may transfer or assign the decree to another person.
2. Holder of Decree
The holder of the decree is the person who currently possesses the decree, whether or not he is the original decree-holder.
This term is often used when the decree has been transferred, assigned, or endorsed to someone else.
For example, a decree-holder may sell or transfer the decree to a moneylender or bank, making the transferee the holder of the decree.
The holder of decree can enforce the decree just like the original decree-holder, after proper legal formalities.
🔹 Key Differences
Feature | Decree Holder | Holder of Decree |
---|---|---|
Identity | Original party in whose favor the decree is passed | Person who possesses the decree (may be transferee) |
Title | Has original legal title to decree | Acquires title by transfer or assignment |
Right to Execute | Has inherent right to execute decree | Can execute only after proving transfer or assignment |
Role in Suit | Real party to the suit | Not a party to original suit; acquires decree post-suit |
Examples | Plaintiff who won money decree | Bank or person to whom decree was assigned |
🔹 Legal Position and Execution
According to Order 21 Rule 2(1) CPC, execution proceedings are generally instituted by the decree-holder or his legal representative.
If the decree is transferred, the transferee (holder of decree) must produce the original decree and proof of transfer before the executing court.
The executing court will recognize the holder of decree as entitled to execute the decree.
⚖️ Relevant Case Laws
1. Union of India v. Godfrey Phillips India Ltd., AIR 1986 SC 1410
Held: The decree-holder is the real party to the suit and has inherent right to enforce the decree.
The right can be transferred, and the transferee becomes the holder of the decree.
2. Kailash v. Nanhku, AIR 1965 SC 1426
Held: A decree-holder can assign the decree to another person.
The holder of the decree is entitled to enforce it, provided the assignment is proved.
3. M.C. Chockalingam v. Union of India, AIR 1961 SC 1808
Held: The holder of decree must produce proof of transfer to enforce the decree.
Without such proof, the person cannot be treated as decree-holder.
📝 Summary Table
Aspect | Decree Holder | Holder of Decree |
---|---|---|
Definition | Person in whose favor decree passed | Person in possession of decree post-transfer |
Legal Status | Original party to the suit | Transferee or assignee of decree |
Right to Execute | Inherent | Upon proof of transfer |
Party to Suit | Yes | No |
Proof Required | No (original party) | Yes (proof of assignment/transfer) |
💡 Practical Importance
When executing a decree, identity and proof of entitlement matter.
Courts require that a holder of decree must establish his right through valid transfer documents.
This distinction helps prevent fraudulent execution attempts by unauthorized persons.
0 comments