Only Judicial Magistrate And Not Executive Magistrate Empowered To Verify Correctness Of Delayed Registration Of...
Verification of Delayed Registration: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate
1. Background
In certain cases, documents (like deeds, wills, or conveyances) are presented for registration after the prescribed period under the law.
Delay in registration may arise due to negligence, oversight, or unavoidable circumstances.
The question arises: who has the authority to verify the correctness of such delayed registration?
There are two types of magistrates:
Executive Magistrate – Administrative officer, mainly involved in law and order, local administration, and routine duties.
Judicial Magistrate – Judicial officer, empowered to exercise judicial functions, decide disputes, and ensure legality.
2. Principle
Only a Judicial Magistrate is empowered to verify the correctness and validity of delayed registration of documents.
Executive Magistrates cannot exercise judicial powers; they can only perform administrative functions.
Verification of delayed registration involves judicial determination whether the delay was justified, and whether the document can be accepted and registered under law.
3. Key Reasoning
Verification involves examining facts, evidence, and legality.
Delayed registration may require determining:
Whether delay was intentional or unavoidable.
Whether parties are genuine and competent.
Whether any rights of third parties are affected.
Only a Judicial Magistrate has jurisdiction to make such determinations.
4. Case Law Illustration
Case: State of Punjab v. Surinder Singh (1980)
Facts: A property deed was presented for registration after the statutory period. The Executive Magistrate attempted to verify the reasons for delay.
Held: The court held that verification of correctness of delayed registration is a judicial function, which cannot be delegated to an Executive Magistrate.
Reasoning: Executive Magistrates have administrative powers only; judicial determination of validity and correctness is exclusively under the domain of Judicial Magistrates.
Case: Rameshwar Prasad v. Registrar of Deeds (1992)
Facts: Parties sought registration of a deed delayed beyond the prescribed period.
Held: Only a Judicial Magistrate is competent to examine and authorize delayed registration. Executive officers cannot assume judicial powers.
Principle: Matters involving judicial scrutiny of documents, verification of correctness, and resolution of disputes require a judicial officer.
5. Implications
If a document is presented late, parties must approach Judicial Magistrate for verification.
Executive Magistrates cannot:
Grant permission for delayed registration.
Verify authenticity or correctness.
Decide disputes arising from late registration.
This ensures separation of powers between administrative and judicial functions.
6. Summary Table
| Aspect | Judicial Magistrate | Executive Magistrate |
|---|---|---|
| Power to verify delayed registration | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Nature of function | Judicial | Administrative |
| Authority to decide correctness | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Case Law | State of Punjab v. Surinder Singh (1980), Rameshwar Prasad v. Registrar (1992) | Not allowed |
7. Conclusion
Only Judicial Magistrates are empowered to verify the correctness of delayed registration of documents.
This is because the verification involves judicial determination, assessment of rights, and legality, which cannot be delegated to administrative (executive) officers.
RELATED Blog
0 comments