Difference Between Necessary Party and Proper Party
Difference Between Necessary Party and Proper Party
1. Definition of Necessary Party
A Necessary Party is a person without whom a complete and effective adjudication of the dispute is not possible.
If a necessary party is not joined, the court cannot pass a valid and binding judgment affecting the subject matter or the rights of the existing parties.
The absence of a necessary party may lead to incomplete relief or inconsistent judgments.
Such a party’s presence is essential to decide the suit fully and conclusively.
2. Definition of Proper Party
A Proper Party is a person who should be joined in a suit because the subject matter of the dispute concerns them or their rights, but the suit can still proceed without them.
The presence of a proper party helps in complete justice and avoids multiplicity of suits, but their absence does not make the suit incompetent.
The court may or may not join a proper party depending on the circumstances.
The presence of a proper party is desirable but not indispensable.
3. Key Differences
| Aspect | Necessary Party | Proper Party |
|---|---|---|
| Essence | Indispensable for effective adjudication | Desirable but not indispensable |
| Effect of Non-joinder | Suit cannot proceed or judgment may be ineffective | Suit can proceed, but joinder may be ordered |
| Role in Suit | Without them, court cannot pass complete decree | Court can pass decree, but joinder avoids multiple suits |
| Example | Co-owner in a suit for partition of property | Person interested but not essential to decision |
4. Case Law Illustrations
Necessary Party Case:
Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (AIR 1979 SC 1360)
The Supreme Court held that certain parties were necessary because their rights would be directly affected by the suit, and their absence would make the decree ineffective.
Proper Party Case:
Laxmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India (AIR 1969 SC 1239)
The court held that some parties were proper parties, whose presence was desirable for complete justice, but their absence would not invalidate the suit.
5. Examples for Clarity
In a partition suit, all co-owners of the property are necessary parties — without their presence, the court cannot divide the property effectively.
In a suit concerning a contract dispute, a third party who may have some interest but is not directly involved is a proper party — their presence is helpful but not mandatory.
6. Why It Matters
Identifying necessary and proper parties ensures justice without delay.
Avoids multiplicity of litigation by bringing all essential parties together.
Helps courts issue effective and enforceable decrees.
7. Summary Table
| Feature | Necessary Party | Proper Party |
|---|---|---|
| Required for suit to proceed | Yes | No |
| Effect of non-joinder | Suit may be dismissed or judgment invalid | Suit proceeds, joinder optional |
| Examples | Co-owners, joint contractors | Interested but not directly involved parties |
| Purpose | Complete and binding adjudication | Convenience and complete justice |
RELATED Blog
0 comments