Centre's Relentless War Against Corona Has Enhanced India's Image
Detailed Explanation
1. Background Context
The COVID-19 pandemic tested every country’s governance, healthcare system, and administrative machinery. India faced unique challenges: a massive population, socio-economic disparity, and limited medical infrastructure. The Central Government adopted proactive steps like nationwide lockdowns, vaccination drives, and relief packages.
This aggressive and relentless war against Corona helped India project itself globally as:
A country capable of handling a health crisis.
A leader in vaccine production and supply ("Vaccine Maitri").
A democratic nation balancing rights and restrictions.
Thus, India’s international image improved as both a domestic protector and a global helper.
2. Role of the Centre
Nationwide Lockdowns & SOPs: The Centre coordinated with States to impose lockdowns, regulate movement, and issue Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs).
Healthcare Measures: Creation of COVID hospitals, oxygen corridors, PPE kits distribution, vaccination campaigns.
Economic Relief: Financial packages under "Aatmanirbhar Bharat" to sustain economy.
International Aid: Export of vaccines and medicines to other nations, strengthening diplomatic ties.
3. Constitutional and Legal Principles Involved
Even without citing external laws, we can analyze through constitutional principles and judicial interpretations:
Right to Life (Article 21): The Centre’s measures were in line with protecting the fundamental right to life.
Directive Principles of State Policy (Article 47): Duty of the State to improve public health.
Cooperative Federalism: Though health is primarily a State subject, the Centre coordinated through guidelines and assistance.
4. Judicial Support – Case Laws
Parmanand Katara v. Union of India (1989)
The Supreme Court held that preservation of life is of paramount importance.
Relevance: The Centre’s steps to provide oxygen, hospitals, and vaccines aligned with this duty.
Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)
Court held that failure of the government to provide timely medical aid violates Article 21.
Relevance: Central initiatives like COVID-care centres and testing labs ensured compliance with this principle.
Mohd. Ahmed (Minor) v. Union of India (2014)
Court emphasized that access to affordable medicine is part of the right to life.
Relevance: Free vaccination drive by Centre upheld this judicial mandate.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) (Indirect Relevance)
Court stressed on constitutional morality and dignity of individuals.
Relevance: Restrictions like lockdowns balanced individual liberty with collective safety, echoing constitutional morality.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)
Right to privacy recognized as fundamental.
Relevance: Use of Aarogya Setu app raised privacy debates, but measures were upheld considering larger public health safety.
5. Impact on India’s Image
Domestic Perception: Citizens saw a strong central leadership in crisis management.
International Perception:
India as “Pharmacy of the World.”
Diplomatic goodwill by supplying vaccines to over 90 countries.
Projected as a responsible democracy capable of balancing liberty and restrictions.
📊 Summary Table
| Aspect | Centre’s Action | Judicial Support | Impact on India’s Image |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protection of Life | Free vaccines, hospitals, oxygen supply | Parmanand Katara (1989), Paschim Banga (1996) | Projected India as life-saving nation |
| Access to Medicine | Free vaccination & essential drugs | Mohd. Ahmed (2014) | Showcased India’s affordability in healthcare |
| Balancing Liberty & Safety | Lockdowns, Aarogya Setu app | Puttaswamy (2017), Navtej Johar (2018) | Strengthened image of democracy upholding collective good |
| Public Health Duty | Nationwide guidelines, relief packages | Directive Principle interpretation | Enhanced trust in governance |
| International Diplomacy | Vaccine Maitri, aid to other countries | Moral obligation under global cooperation | Elevated India as global leader |
✅ Conclusion:
The Centre’s relentless efforts during COVID-19 were constitutionally justified, judicially supported, and globally admired. Courts reinforced that the right to life includes health and medical care, while the Centre’s measures fulfilled this mandate. As a result, India’s image as a strong, responsible, and humanitarian nation was enhanced worldwide.
RELATED Blog
0 comments