Centre, States Must Ensure Manual Scavenging Is Completely Eradicated: SC Issues 14 Directions
Supreme Court Directs Centre and States to Completely Eradicate Manual Scavenging — Detailed Explanation
Background:
Manual scavenging refers to the practice of manually cleaning, carrying, or disposing of human excreta from dry latrines, sewers, septic tanks, etc. It is a degrading and hazardous occupation, historically associated with social discrimination and grave health risks.
The Supreme Court has consistently condemned this practice as a violation of human dignity and fundamental rights and has issued comprehensive directions to eradicate it completely.
Key Directions Issued by the Supreme Court:
The Supreme Court, recognizing the persistence of manual scavenging in many parts of the country despite laws and policies, issued 14 detailed directions to the Centre and State governments. These directions focus on:
Identification and Survey of Manual Scavengers:
Authorities must conduct thorough surveys to identify persons engaged in manual scavenging.
Rehabilitation and Alternative Livelihood:
Steps must be taken to rehabilitate manual scavengers by providing alternative employment and skill training.
Provision of Mechanized Cleaning:
All cleaning of septic tanks and sewers should be done by mechanized means to avoid manual handling.
Strict Enforcement and Prohibition:
States must enforce a complete ban on manual scavenging and penalize violations.
Awareness and Social Reform:
Sensitization and awareness programs to eliminate social stigma associated with manual scavenging.
Monitoring and Accountability:
Setting up monitoring committees and appointing nodal officers to ensure compliance.
Legal Reasoning and Principles:
Violation of Right to Life and Dignity:
Manual scavenging infringes on the fundamental right to life with dignity.
The practice is inherently degrading and humiliating.
State’s Obligation to Protect Human Rights:
The government has a constitutional obligation to protect citizens from exploitation and discrimination.
Eradication of manual scavenging is part of the State’s duty to uphold human dignity.
Prohibition of Forced Labor:
Manual scavenging amounts to forced, degrading labor and must be eliminated.
Equality and Non-Discrimination:
Manual scavenging is often linked to social discrimination; eradication is necessary to achieve equality.
Preventive and Punitive Measures:
Effective enforcement, with penalties for violations, is essential to eliminate the practice.
Rehabilitation and Social Justice:
Merely banning the practice is insufficient; holistic rehabilitation and social integration of affected persons is vital.
Case Law Principle (Based on Supreme Court Reasoning):
Courts have held that any form of employment or practice that strips a person of dignity and health is unconstitutional.
The State is mandated to take proactive steps to eliminate such practices and protect vulnerable groups.
Judicial intervention ensures that laws are implemented effectively and rights are safeguarded.
Summary Table:
| Aspect | Supreme Court Direction / Principle |
|---|---|
| Identification | Conduct surveys to identify manual scavengers. |
| Rehabilitation | Provide alternative employment and training. |
| Mechanization | Use machines for cleaning sewers and septic tanks. |
| Ban & Enforcement | Strict prohibition and penalties for violations. |
| Awareness | Educate public and remove stigma. |
| Monitoring | Set up committees and appoint officers for oversight. |
| Legal Principle | Right to life with dignity; State’s duty to eliminate exploitation. |
Illustrative Explanation:
Suppose a village still employs manual scavenging due to lack of alternatives. The Supreme Court’s directions require the State to identify such cases, provide machines or equipment so no one has to do the job manually, rehabilitate workers into dignified jobs, and penalize anyone who forces manual scavenging.
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s comprehensive directions reflect a strong judicial commitment to eradicate manual scavenging once and for all. This effort aligns with the fundamental right to live with dignity and the constitutional mandate for equality and social justice. The Court’s instructions impose a binding obligation on the Centre and States to take concrete, measurable steps to eliminate this hazardous and dehumanizing practice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments