J&K&L HC Imposes Rs 1 Lakh Cost For Forum Shopping
What is Forum Shopping?
Forum shopping is a practice where a litigant files multiple cases on the same issue in different courts or jurisdictions, seeking a favorable forum or outcome.
It is considered an abuse of the court’s process and an unethical litigation tactic.
Courts discourage forum shopping because it:
Wastes judicial time and resources.
Creates unnecessary multiplicity of proceedings.
Causes harassment to the opposing parties.
Undermines the administration of justice.
J&K & Ladakh High Court’s Position on Forum Shopping
Case Context
The J&K & Ladakh High Court has taken a strict stance against forum shopping by imposing monetary costs on litigants who engage in it.
In a recent judgment, the court imposed a cost of Rs 1 Lakh on a party found guilty of forum shopping.
The court emphasized that such conduct cannot be tolerated as it adversely affects judicial discipline and delays justice.
Judicial Reasoning
Condemnation of Forum Shopping
The Court reiterated that the judicial system expects honesty and good faith from litigants. Filing multiple suits or proceedings for the same cause in different forums is a blatant misuse of the court process.
Deterrence by Cost Imposition
The Court imposed a heavy cost of Rs 1 Lakh to act as a deterrent to litigants contemplating forum shopping. The idea is to discourage frivolous or vexatious litigation aimed at manipulating the judicial process.
Preservation of Judicial Time
Forum shopping leads to duplication of efforts, conflicting decisions, and clogging of courts. The imposition of costs serves as a mechanism to protect courts from such abuse.
Relevant Case Law Reflecting the Principle (Within Indian Jurisprudence)
1. Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. (Supreme Court)
The Supreme Court condemned forum shopping as unethical and emphasized the duty of litigants to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
2. Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Coca Cola Co. (Supreme Court)
The Court held that filing multiple suits on the same cause of action is oppressive and an abuse of the process of the court.
3. K.K. Verma v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court imposed costs for forum shopping, emphasizing that such conduct delays justice and wastes judicial resources.
Summary Table
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Forum shopping | Filing multiple cases on same issue in different courts. |
| J&K & Ladakh HC stance | Imposed Rs 1 Lakh cost as deterrent against forum shopping. |
| Reason for costs | Protect judicial time, maintain integrity, discourage misuse. |
| Case law principle | Forum shopping is abuse of process and unethical conduct. |
Practical Implications
Litigants must choose the appropriate forum wisely and avoid multiple filings.
Courts are empowered to impose heavy costs on parties abusing the judicial process through forum shopping.
Such cost impositions reinforce the principle of judicial discipline and integrity.
RELATED Blog
0 comments