Insult Of Vice-President By Mimicry Is Just Not Acceptable
๐น Context & Principle
The Vice-President of India is the second highest constitutional office after the President.
This office commands respect and dignity because it is part of the framework of governance and constitutional sanctity.
While freedom of speech and expression is guaranteed, it cannot be exercised to insult or demean constitutional dignitaries.
Mimicry or caricature that amounts to mockery or insult undermines the dignity of the office and is considered unacceptable.
๐น Legal and Constitutional Basis
1. Respect for Constitutional Authority
The Vice-President performs constitutional functions (e.g., ex officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha).
Insulting the office undermines the authority and dignity of the constitutional setup.
Protecting such offices helps maintain public confidence in governance.
2. Freedom of Speech with Reasonable Restrictions
Article 19(1)(a) guarantees free speech.
Article 19(2) allows reasonable restrictions on free speech for public order, decency, morality, defamation, and protection of reputation.
Insulting high constitutional officials can be curtailed under these grounds.
๐น Key Case Law
โ R.K. Anand v. Delhi High Court, (2009) 8 SCC 106
The Supreme Court observed that freedom of speech is not absolute.
Speech or expression that offends, insults, or humiliates a person or institution can be restricted.
Respecting constitutional offices is essential for maintaining constitutional morality.
โ S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal, (2010) 5 SCC 600
While primarily about decency and morality, the Court held that speech causing insult or affront to dignity can be restricted.
Mimicry that amounts to derision or insult can fall under such restrictions.
โ Union of India v. R. Gandhi, (2010) 11 SCC 1
The Court recognized the importance of protecting dignity of public offices.
Speech aimed at ridiculing or demeaning constitutional offices can be curtailed to maintain respect for the Constitution.
๐น Why Mimicry of Vice-President is Not Acceptable
Dignity of Office: The Vice-President symbolizes the constitutional authority; mocking this through mimicry reduces respect.
Public Confidence: Disrespect affects how citizens perceive institutions.
Order and Decorum: Parliamentary and constitutional offices demand decorum, which should be respected in public discourse.
Avoidance of Defamation or Hurt: Mimicry can be defamatory or hurtful, violating reasonable restrictions on speech.
๐น Summary Table
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Vice-Presidentโs Office | Second highest constitutional office requiring respect |
| Mimicry as Speech | Protected under free speech but not if insulting/demeaning |
| Reasonable Restrictions | Allowed to protect dignity, public order, and morality |
| Judicial Position | Courts uphold dignity and limit speech that insults offices |
๐ Conclusion
While freedom of speech is fundamental, mimicry or any form of expression that insults the Vice-President or diminishes the dignity of this constitutional office is not acceptable. Courts uphold the principle that such expression falls outside the ambit of protected free speech because it threatens constitutional decorum, respect for institutions, and public confidence in governance.
Respect for the Vice-President and other constitutional dignitaries is essential to maintaining the integrity and functioning of the democratic system.
RELATED Blog
0 comments