Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice

๐Ÿ“˜ RES JUDICATA vs. RES SUB JUDICE 

AspectRes JudicataRes Sub Judice
Meaning"A matter already judged""A matter under judicial consideration"
SectionSection 11, Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908Section 10, Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
PurposeTo avoid re-litigation of the same matterTo avoid conflicting decisions in simultaneous litigation
ApplicabilityBars a second suit on the same cause of action once a final judgment is deliveredBars a parallel suit on the same matter if one is already pending
When It AppliesAfter a case is finally decidedWhen a case is still pending
EffectSuit is not maintainableSuit is stayed until the first one is decided
FinalityBased on a concluded caseBased on a pending case
ObjectiveTo uphold the finality of judicial decisionsTo prevent contradictory judgments and multiplicity of litigation

โš–๏ธ 1. RES JUDICATA โ€“ Explained

โœ… Definition:

Res Judicata is a legal doctrine that prevents the same dispute between the same parties from being tried again once it has been finally decided by a competent court.

Latin: โ€œRes Judicata pro veritate accipiturโ€
Meaning: A thing adjudged is taken as truth.

โœ… Ingredients (as per Section 11, CPC):

To apply Res Judicata, the following conditions must be satisfied:

The matter in issue must be the same in both suits.

The parties must be the same (or their representatives).

The matter must have been finally decided by a competent court.

The prior decision must have been on merits.

๐Ÿ“Œ Landmark Case Law:

๐Ÿ”น Daryao vs. State of U.P. (AIR 1961 SC 1457)

The Supreme Court held that Res Judicata applies to writ petitions as well.

If a petition is dismissed on merits, another petition on the same grounds cannot be filed again.

๐Ÿ”น Satyadhyan Ghosal vs. Deorajin Debi (AIR 1960 SC 941)

Explained that the principle of Res Judicata is based on the need to prevent repeated litigation.

Even interlocutory orders may operate as Res Judicata in certain cases.

โš–๏ธ 2. RES SUB JUDICE โ€“ Explained

โœ… Definition:

Res Sub Judice is the principle that when two suits involving the same matter and same parties are filed, the second suit should be stayed until the first is decided.

Prevents two courts from deciding the same issue simultaneously.

โœ… Ingredients (as per Section 10, CPC):

To apply Res Sub Judice:

The matter in issue must be directly and substantially the same.

The previously instituted suit must be pending in a court of competent jurisdiction.

Both suits must involve the same parties or parties under whom they claim.

The second suit must be filed during the pendency of the first.

๐Ÿ“Œ Landmark Case Law:

๐Ÿ”น National Institute of Mental Health vs. C. Parameshwara (AIR 2005 SC 242)

Held that if the matter is already pending before a competent court, the second suit should be stayed to avoid conflicting decisions.

๐Ÿ”น Indian Bank vs. Maharashtra State Coop. Marketing Federation (AIR 1998 SC 1952)

The Supreme Court emphasized that the purpose of Section 10 is to avoid conflicting judgments and save judicial time.

๐Ÿง  KEY DIFFERENCES (Summarized):

PointRes JudicataRes Sub Judice
Stage of caseAfter final judgmentDuring pendency
EffectBars future suitStays the trial of second suit
FocusFinality of decisionPrevention of conflicting decisions
NatureEstoppelProcedural stay
Based onPast decisionPending litigation

โœ… Conclusion

Res Judicata is about finality โ€” once a dispute is resolved, it shouldnโ€™t be reopened.

Res Sub Judice is about efficiency and consistency โ€” donโ€™t allow two parallel proceedings on the same issue.

Both doctrines serve the judicial system by preventing abuse of process, saving time, and preserving the sanctity of judicial decisions.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments