Law of Evidence at Serbia
In Serbia, the Law of Evidence is governed by the Serbian Civil Procedure Code (Zakon o parničnom postupku) and the Serbian Criminal Procedure Code (Zakon o krivičnom postupku). Serbia follows a civil law system, influenced by its history within the Yugoslav and continental European legal traditions, with an emphasis on written laws, judicial precedent, and comprehensive procedural rules.
Key Aspects of the Law of Evidence in Serbia:
1. Types of Evidence:
Documentary Evidence: Written documents (contracts, correspondence, official records, etc.) are significant and form the bulk of evidence in legal proceedings. In civil cases, the court often relies on documents like deeds, contracts, and written agreements to determine rights and obligations.
Witness Testimony: Testimony from witnesses is an important form of evidence in both civil and criminal trials. Witnesses are expected to provide information relevant to the case, and the court assesses their credibility.
Expert Testimony: Expert witnesses are appointed in cases requiring specialized knowledge (e.g., medical, engineering, or accounting). The expert's opinion is considered to help clarify technical aspects of the case.
Physical Evidence: Objects or physical materials relevant to the case (e.g., weapons, drugs, or other items) can be presented as evidence.
Confessions: In criminal law, a confession made by the defendant can be considered evidence. However, the confession must be voluntary and not coerced or extracted under duress.
2. Admissibility of Evidence:
Relevance: Evidence must be relevant to the case and must help establish or disprove the facts at issue.
Legality: Evidence obtained through illegal means (such as unlawful search, torture, or deceit) is generally inadmissible in Serbian courts.
Burden of Proof: The party bringing a claim (in civil cases, the plaintiff; in criminal cases, the prosecution) bears the burden of proof and must present sufficient evidence to substantiate their case.
3. Hearsay Evidence:
Hearsay (testimony about statements made outside of court) is generally not admissible unless it falls under specific exceptions. However, there are circumstances in which statements made outside of court can be used as evidence, such as when they come from an unavailable witness or are part of an established document.
4. Burden of Proof:
Civil Cases: In civil cases, the burden of proof typically lies with the party asserting the claim (the plaintiff). The plaintiff must prove the facts that support their legal claim, typically by a preponderance of evidence (more likely than not).
Criminal Cases: In criminal cases, the burden of proof rests with the prosecution, which must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
5. Witnesses:
Witnesses must be competent to testify and are questioned by both parties involved in the case (direct and cross-examination). Their testimony is taken seriously, but the court has the discretion to evaluate the credibility of the witness and the reliability of their testimony.
Witness Protection: In serious criminal cases, there are provisions for witness protection, particularly when witnesses are at risk of harm for testifying.
6. Expert Testimony:
In cases where the subject matter requires specialized knowledge, the court may appoint an expert witness. Expert testimony is used to clarify technical aspects of a case, such as forensic analysis, medical diagnoses, or financial assessments.
The expert’s opinion is evaluated alongside other evidence, and it is not binding on the court.
7. Presumptions:
Serbian law recognizes legal presumptions, where certain facts can be presumed based on the presence of other facts. For example, if a person is found with stolen goods in their possession, it may be presumed that they are the thief unless they can provide a reasonable explanation.
8. Criminal Law Evidence:
In criminal cases, evidence can include confessions, witness testimony, physical evidence (e.g., fingerprints, DNA, or surveillance footage), and expert testimony. The prosecution must present sufficient evidence to meet the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Illegal Evidence: Evidence obtained through illegal means (such as an unlawful search or coerced confession) may be excluded in criminal proceedings. However, the courts may permit such evidence in certain circumstances where it is deemed necessary to establish the truth.
9. Electronic Evidence:
Electronic evidence (emails, text messages, digital files, etc.) is recognized in Serbia. However, for such evidence to be admissible, it must be authenticated, meaning that its integrity must be verified. Courts may require experts to authenticate digital evidence to ensure its legitimacy and reliability.
This is particularly relevant in cases involving fraud, cybercrime, or online activities.
10. Family Law Evidence:
In family law cases (e.g., divorce, child custody, or inheritance), documentary evidence like marriage certificates, financial statements, and other personal records are often key in determining outcomes. Testimonies from both the parties and relevant third parties may be used to establish the facts.
11. Procedural Rules:
The Serbian Civil Procedure Code governs the procedure for presenting evidence in civil cases. It sets out rules for presenting documents, calling witnesses, and requesting expert opinions. Similarly, the Serbian Criminal Procedure Code governs how evidence is presented in criminal trials.
Both codes allow the judge to control the evidence-gathering process and the introduction of evidence at trial. In civil cases, the judge may even direct the parties to produce specific evidence.
12. Exclusionary Rules:
Exclusionary rules apply to evidence that has been unlawfully obtained, such as evidence from illegal searches or coerced confessions. This evidence can generally be excluded, though exceptions may exist in cases where it serves the public interest or justice.
Conclusion:
Serbia’s Law of Evidence emphasizes the importance of documentary and testimonial evidence, with a clear structure for determining the relevance, admissibility, and credibility of evidence presented in court. The burden of proof lies with the claimant in civil cases and with the prosecution in criminal cases, and there are significant rules governing the use of hearsay evidence, witness testimony, and electronic evidence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments