Secondary Infringement under Intellectual Property
Secondary Infringement under Intellectual Property
I. Introduction
Secondary infringement occurs when a party, although not directly committing the primary act of infringement (such as unauthorized copying or use), contributes to or facilitates another’s infringement of intellectual property rights.
It is an important concept because it expands liability beyond the direct infringer to others who assist, encourage, or enable infringement.
II. Types of Secondary Infringement
Secondary infringement typically arises in two main forms:
Contributory Infringement
When a party knowingly induces, causes, or materially contributes to another's direct infringement.
Vicarious Infringement
When a party has the right and ability to control the infringer’s acts and derives a direct financial benefit from the infringement.
III. Elements of Secondary Infringement
To establish secondary infringement, generally the following elements must be shown:
Knowledge or Awareness: The secondary infringer must know or be aware that the primary infringement is occurring or likely to occur.
Material Contribution or Control: The secondary infringer must have materially contributed to or controlled the infringement.
Benefit: In vicarious infringement, the secondary infringer benefits financially or otherwise from the infringement.
IV. Case Examples
Case 1: Contributory Infringement
(Hypothetical) Case: DigitalShare Inc. v. CreativeWorks
Facts: DigitalShare Inc. runs an online platform where users upload and share copyrighted movies. DigitalShare knows that most of the movies uploaded are unauthorized copies but does not take steps to prevent it.
Holding: DigitalShare is liable for contributory infringement.
Reasoning: DigitalShare had actual knowledge of the infringement and materially contributed by providing the platform that enabled the distribution of copyrighted works.
Case 2: Vicarious Infringement
(Hypothetical) Case: MusicLounge v. BeatMasters Club
Facts: BeatMasters Club hosts live events where unlicensed copies of popular music are played. The club controls the events and profits from ticket sales but does not itself copy the music.
Holding: BeatMasters Club is vicariously liable for infringement.
Reasoning: The club had the right to control the infringing performances and directly benefited financially from the use of unauthorized music.
V. Significance of Secondary Infringement
Secondary infringement doctrine:
Helps curb large-scale infringement facilitated by intermediaries.
Encourages responsible behavior from platforms, distributors, and service providers.
Extends liability to those who profit from or enable infringement without directly committing the act.
VI. Defenses and Limitations
Lack of Knowledge: If the secondary infringer had no knowledge or reason to know of infringement, liability may not arise.
No Control or Contribution: Merely having a connection to the infringer is insufficient without actual control or material contribution.
Safe Harbor Practices: Some entities may avoid liability by implementing measures to prevent or stop infringement once notified.
Summary
| Type | Description | Key Requirement | Hypothetical Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contributory Infringement | Knowingly facilitates infringement | Knowledge + material contribution | Online platform enabling illegal uploads |
| Vicarious Infringement | Controls infringer’s acts and benefits financially | Control + financial benefit | Club profiting from unauthorized music use |
Conclusion
Secondary infringement broadens the scope of intellectual property enforcement by holding accountable those who aid, abet, or profit from the infringement committed by others. This doctrine ensures that indirect facilitators cannot evade responsibility simply because they are not the direct infringers.
RELATED Blog
0 comments