Priority of Inventions under Intellectual Property
Priority of Inventions under Intellectual Property
Overview
The priority of inventions refers to the principle that determines which inventor has the right to claim ownership of an invention when more than one person claims to have invented the same thing. It is a fundamental concept in patent law within intellectual property.
Priority establishes who was the first to invent or first to file for protection, depending on the system applied, and thereby who has the right to a patent or exclusive rights.
Key Concepts
First to Invent vs. First to File
There are two main approaches (theoretical here, without external laws):
First to Invent: The right goes to the person who actually created the invention first, regardless of when they filed a patent application.
First to File: The right is given to the first person who files a patent application, regardless of the actual date of invention.
Proof of Invention Date
Inventors must provide evidence of when the invention was conceived and reduced to practice. This may include lab notebooks, prototypes, or dated documentation.
Interference Proceedings
When two parties claim the same invention, a legal process (interference) may be used to determine who has priority.
Public Disclosure Impact
Publicly disclosing an invention before filing can affect priority and patentability, as the invention may no longer be considered novel.
Importance of Priority
Ensures fairness among competing inventors.
Encourages prompt disclosure and filing of inventions.
Provides legal certainty on ownership of inventions.
Prevents multiple patents on the same invention.
Hypothetical Case Law Example
Case: Nguyen v. Taylor
Facts:
Nguyen and Taylor independently developed a new type of energy-efficient motor. Nguyen began experiments earlier but filed a patent application several months after Taylor, who filed soon after inventing. Both claimed priority over the invention.
Issue:
Which inventor had priority rights to the patent—the first to invent (Nguyen) or the first to file (Taylor)?
Decision:
The court examined detailed lab records and prototypes showing Nguyen’s earlier invention date but noted Taylor’s earlier filing. Applying the principle favoring actual invention over filing, the court awarded priority to Nguyen.
Outcome:
Nguyen was granted patent rights, and Taylor’s application was rejected. The case emphasized the importance of clear evidence of invention date and the impact of filing timing.
Summary
Priority of inventions is a core principle that resolves disputes between inventors claiming the same innovation. Whether priority is based on first to invent or first to file, establishing the date of invention and filing is crucial. This principle safeguards the rights of true inventors and supports the orderly granting of patents.
RELATED Blog
0 comments