Geographical Indications Law in Ethiopia
Geographical Indications (GIs) Law in Ethiopia
Geographical Indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property (IP) that identify a product as originating from a specific place, where a given quality, reputation, or other characteristic of the product is essentially attributable to its geographical origin.
1. Legal Framework for GIs in Ethiopia
Ethiopia does not have a standalone Geographical Indications Law, but GIs are protected under the broader Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) regime, particularly through:
Proclamation No. 501/2006: Proclamation on Trademark Registration and Protection.
Regulation No. 273/2012: Council of Ministers Regulation to Provide for the Registration and Protection of Trademarks.
This framework allows for the protection of GIs primarily under the trademark law as either:
Certification Marks, or
Collective Marks.
2. Key Aspects of GI Protection in Ethiopia
No Specific GI Registry: Unlike some countries, Ethiopia does not maintain a separate register for GIs. Instead, GIs can be protected via registration as certification or collective marks.
Ownership and Management: Typically, associations or cooperatives of producers may apply for GI-like protection using certification or collective marks.
Famous Examples:
Ethiopian Coffee Brands: Such as Yirgacheffe, Sidamo, and Harrar are internationally recognized for their unique qualities due to their geographic origin. Ethiopia has used trademark protection in multiple countries to protect these names.
Ethiopian Fine Coffee Strategy: In 2004, Ethiopia adopted a branding and licensing initiative for its fine coffees to strengthen the international market position of its coffee brands, using trademarks to secure rights in major coffee-consuming countries.
3. International Aspects
WTO/TRIPS Compliance: Ethiopia is not yet a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), but its legal framework for IP, including GIs, is aligned in part with the TRIPS Agreement (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights), which mandates protection for GIs.
ARIPO Membership: Ethiopia is not a member of the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), which provides a framework for GI registration among African countries.
4. Challenges
Lack of dedicated GI law or registry.
Limited awareness among producers about the value of GIs.
Weak enforcement mechanisms.
Limited technical capacity for branding and market development.
5. Opportunities
High potential for GI protection in sectors like coffee, honey, spices, and traditional textiles.
Potential for economic development through rural branding.
Scope for legal reform to create a dedicated GI system aligned with international standards.
Conclusion:
While Ethiopia does not have a dedicated GI law, it protects geographical names of products through trademark mechanisms. The country’s approach, particularly in the coffee sector, has gained international attention and sets the stage for a more formal GI system in the future. Legal reforms to create a specific GI law and registry could enhance Ethiopia’s ability to protect and promote its unique local products.
RELATED Blog
0 comments