Preemption by Patent Laws under Intellectual Property
What is Preemption by Patent Laws?
Preemption means that when federal patent laws cover a certain area of innovation or invention, they override or exclude state laws that might also try to regulate or control the same subject matter. This is important because patent law is generally federal, and allowing states to create their own rules could lead to conflicting protections.
So, preemption by patent laws means that federal patent laws can block state laws or claims that interfere with or duplicate patent rights.
Why Does Preemption Occur?
Patent laws grant exclusive rights to inventors over their inventions for a limited time. This federal grant includes:
The right to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention.
A uniform system of patent protection across the country.
Allowing state laws to provide different or additional protections could upset this balance and create inconsistent rights.
Types of State Claims Preempted by Patent Laws
State law claims that duplicate patent rights.
For example, a state law claim of infringement that tries to impose liability for making or selling an invention already covered by a patent is preempted.
Claims that conflict with patent policy.
If a state law claim would upset the balance of incentives and limitations established by patent laws, it can be preempted.
Claims that attempt to extend patent rights beyond the patent term or scope.
Important Case Law on Preemption by Patent Law
1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. (1964)
Facts: Sears was sued under state unfair competition law for copying a lamp design that was not patented.
Holding: The Supreme Court held that when an item is not patented, the state cannot grant exclusive rights through unfair competition law. If the federal patent system denies protection, state law cannot create equivalent rights.
Significance: This case shows that state law cannot offer patent-like protection to unpatented inventions, ensuring that federal patent law preempts state laws that would extend patent rights beyond what is granted federally.
2. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. (1964)
Facts: Compco copied Day-Brite’s unpatented product design and was sued under Illinois unfair competition law.
Holding: The Court ruled that the state law claim was preempted by patent law because it sought to protect a design that was not patented, which federal law allows to be copied.
Significance: Reinforced that state law cannot forbid copying of unpatented articles when federal patent law leaves them in the public domain.
3. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. (1989)
Facts: Florida law prohibited copying of boat hull designs without a patent, but the hull design was not patented.
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that this Florida law was preempted because it conflicted with the federal patent policy of leaving unpatented inventions free to be copied.
Significance: This case further confirmed that state laws cannot impose patent-like restrictions on unpatented designs or inventions.
When Are State Claims Not Preempted?
If state laws protect interests different from patent rights, like contract rights or trademark rights, those claims may not be preempted.
State laws addressing unfair competition in a broader sense (e.g., false advertising) may survive preemption if they don't conflict with patent rights.
Summary Table on Preemption by Patent Laws
| Case | Issue | Holding | Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sears v. Stiffel | State unfair competition on unpatented design | State law preempted | No state protection beyond patents |
| Compco v. Day-Brite | State unfair competition on copying unpatented product | Preempted by patent law | Federal patent law exclusive |
| Bonito Boats v. Thunder Craft | State law prohibiting copying unpatented design | State law preempted | Federal policy favors free copying |
Conclusion
Preemption by patent law ensures that federal patent protections are exclusive and uniform. States cannot create or enforce laws that conflict with or duplicate the rights granted by patent law. The key cases (Sears, Compco, and Bonito Boats) firmly establish that state laws attempting to protect unpatented inventions or extend patent rights beyond their scope are preempted.
RELATED Blog
0 comments