Patent Infringement under Intellectual Property
🔹 What is Patent Infringement?
Patent infringement occurs when a party makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, or imports a patented invention without the patent holder’s permission during the term of the patent.
It is essentially a violation of the exclusive rights granted to the patent owner.
Infringement can be direct or indirect (contributory or induced).
🔹 Types of Patent Infringement
Direct Infringement: Unauthorized use of the patented invention.
Indirect Infringement:
Contributory Infringement: Selling a component specially made for use in a patented invention.
Induced Infringement: Encouraging or aiding another to infringe.
🔹 Elements of Patent Infringement
To prove infringement, the patent owner must establish:
Ownership of a valid patent.
Unauthorized making, using, selling, or importing of the patented invention.
The accused product or process falls within the scope of one or more patent claims (claim construction and comparison).
🔹 Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis
The patent’s claims define the legal boundaries of the invention.
Courts interpret the claims’ language to understand the scope.
The accused product/process is compared against the claims:
Literal infringement: All claim elements are present.
Doctrine of equivalents: The accused product performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same result.
🔹 Case Law Examples (Principle-Based)
🧑⚖️ TechCo v. Innovate Inc.
Facts: TechCo owned a patent for a unique battery design. Innovate produced batteries with similar features without a license.
Issue: Did Innovate infringe TechCo’s patent?
Outcome: The court examined the patent claims and found that Innovate’s batteries included all elements of the patented design, constituting direct infringement.
Principle: Unauthorized use of a patented invention within the scope of claims is infringement.
🧑⚖️ PartsPlus v. GearWorks
Facts: GearWorks sold a part specially designed to be used in a patented machine owned by PartsPlus.
Issue: Does GearWorks’ sale constitute indirect infringement?
Outcome: The court held that GearWorks was liable for contributory infringement because the part had no substantial non-infringing use and was intended for use in the patented machine.
Principle: Selling components that enable infringement may constitute contributory infringement.
🔹 Defenses Against Patent Infringement
Non-infringement: The accused product/process does not meet all claim elements.
Invalidity: The patent is invalid due to lack of novelty, obviousness, or other reasons.
Exhaustion: Rights are exhausted after the patent owner’s authorized sale.
Experimental use: Using the invention for research or experimentation may be exempt.
🔹 Remedies for Patent Infringement
Injunctive relief: Court orders to stop the infringing activity.
Damages: Compensation for lost profits or reasonable royalties.
Account of profits: Recovery of profits made by the infringer.
Enhanced damages: For willful infringement, higher damages may be awarded.
🔹 Summary Table
| Element | Description | Example Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Valid patent held by plaintiff | TechCo owned valid battery patent |
| Unauthorized Use | Making, using, selling without permission | Innovate made batteries without license |
| Scope of Claims | Accused product meets patent claim elements | Innovate’s product literally infringed |
| Indirect Infringement | Contributory or induced infringement | GearWorks sold parts for infringing machines |
| Defenses | Non-infringement, invalidity, exhaustion | Defendant argued patent invalid but failed |
✅ Conclusion
Patent infringement protects the patent owner’s exclusive rights and encourages innovation. Understanding the scope of claims, the nature of infringement, and available defenses is critical in assessing potential infringement cases.
RELATED Blog
0 comments