Judgment Reviews Law at Bosnia and Herzegovina
In Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), the judgment review process is governed by a combination of constitutional principles, laws of civil procedure, criminal procedure, and administrative law. The country follows a civil law legal system, heavily influenced by European legal standards, and the judicial review process is structured to ensure that individuals can challenge both court decisions and administrative acts.
Here’s an overview of the judgment review process in Bosnia and Herzegovina:
🏛️ 1. Constitutional Framework
The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1995) guarantees fundamental rights, including the right to a fair trial and the right to an effective remedy, which includes access to justice and the possibility of appealing judicial decisions or challenging administrative decisions.
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which Bosnia and Herzegovina has ratified, ensures the right to a fair trial and provides access to an appeal process for individuals whose rights are affected by judicial decisions.
Constitutional guarantees: The Constitution of BiH and the European Convention on Human Rights are the bedrock for ensuring access to justice and judicial review in the country.
⚖️ 2. The Appeal Process
In Bosnia and Herzegovina, there are clear rules for appealing decisions made by lower courts. The right to appeal is available in both civil and criminal cases, and is governed by the Civil Procedure Code and the Criminal Procedure Code.
2.1. Civil Appeals
Civil Procedure Code (CPC): The CPC regulates civil proceedings and the right to appeal decisions from the basic courts to the cantonal courts or higher courts, depending on the entity (Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina or Republika Srpska).
Appeals from First Instance Courts: Individuals dissatisfied with a judgment from a first-instance court (basic court) can file an appeal to a higher court.
Grounds for Appeal: Appeals in civil cases can be based on errors in law, incorrect assessment of evidence, or procedural mistakes.
Appeal Procedure: An appeal must generally be filed within 15 days from the date the decision was served.
2.2. Criminal Appeals
Criminal Procedure Code (CPC): In criminal matters, a defendant who has been convicted or sentenced can appeal to a higher court.
Grounds for Appeal: Criminal appeals may be based on errors of law, misapplication of facts, or violation of constitutional rights.
Appeal Process: The Court of Appeals or the Higher Court reviews criminal cases. The process typically allows for the reconsideration of legal arguments, re-examination of facts, and sentencing decisions.
⚖️ 3. The Appellate System
The court of appeals plays a critical role in reviewing lower court decisions. The structure of the appellate system in Bosnia and Herzegovina differs slightly based on the entity (Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina vs. Republika Srpska), but both follow similar principles of reviewing and correcting lower court rulings.
3.1. Court of Appeals
Bosnia and Herzegovina has a State Court, as well as entity-level courts.
State Court: The State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina has appellate jurisdiction for cases involving state-level laws and constitutional matters. It is the final court for state matters, such as state security and terrorism-related offenses.
Entity Courts: At the entity level, Cantonal Courts and District Courts hear appeals in civil and criminal cases, and decisions can be appealed to the Court of Appeals at the entity level.
3.2. Time Limits for Appeals
Civil Appeals: The time limit to file an appeal from the judgment of a first-instance court is usually 15 days.
Criminal Appeals: The time limit to file an appeal is typically 15 days, though certain exceptions may apply depending on the nature of the case.
⚖️ 4. Judicial Review of Administrative Acts
In addition to appealing court judgments, Bosnia and Herzegovina provides mechanisms for judicial review of administrative decisions. These mechanisms allow individuals to challenge administrative acts or public authority decisions that they believe are unlawful.
4.1. Administrative Procedure Law
Administrative Procedure Law (AP Law): The Administrative Procedure Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina sets out the procedures for contesting administrative decisions made by public authorities or administrative bodies.
Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions: If an individual believes that a decision made by an administrative body (e.g., a decision about public rights or duties) is unlawful or violates their rights, they can file an application for judicial review at the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina or the relevant entity-level court.
4.2. Grounds for Judicial Review
Judicial review can be initiated on several grounds, including:
Illegality: If the administrative body acted beyond its legal powers or violated the law.
Irrationality: If the decision was so unreasonable that no rational authority would have made it.
Violation of Rights: If the decision infringed on constitutional or human rights.
Procedural Fairness: If the decision-making process was unfair or violated principles of natural justice.
🏛️ 5. The Role of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina
The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina is responsible for reviewing decisions that may involve the constitutionality of laws, statutes, or administrative acts.
The Constitutional Court ensures that all judicial decisions and legislative acts comply with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
If a law or decision is found to be unconstitutional, the Constitutional Court has the authority to invalidate it.
Individuals may also file a constitutional appeal with the Constitutional Court if they believe their rights under the Constitution have been violated.
🌍 6. International Human Rights Considerations
Bosnia and Herzegovina is a signatory to several international human rights treaties, including the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). These treaties influence the judgment review process, ensuring that individuals in Bosnia and Herzegovina have access to fair trial rights, appeals, and judicial review.
The European Court of Human Rights also plays a role in ensuring that the appeal and judicial review processes in Bosnia and Herzegovina comply with international standards for human rights protection.
📑 7. Summary of Key Aspects of Judgment Review in Bosnia and Herzegovina
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Appeals Process | Civil and criminal appeals are possible to higher courts, including the Court of Appeals. |
| Grounds for Appeal | Errors in law, facts, or procedural fairness. |
| Judicial Review of Admin Acts | Judicial review of administrative decisions is available under the Administrative Procedure Law. |
| Court of Appeals | Courts of appeals at the entity level review civil and criminal appeals, while the State Court deals with certain constitutional and state matters. |
| Constitutional Court | The Constitutional Court reviews cases involving the constitutionality of laws and decisions. |
| International Human Rights | Bosnia and Herzegovina adheres to international human rights treaties (e.g., ECHR) to ensure fair trials and appeals. |
| Time Limits | Civil appeals: 15 days; Criminal appeals: 15 days. |
📝 8. Conclusion
The judgment review process in Bosnia and Herzegovina ensures that individuals have access to appeals and judicial review mechanisms to challenge decisions made by lower courts or public authorities. The Court of Appeals and the Constitutional Court play key roles in ensuring justice, fairness, and the protection of rights under the Constitution and international law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments