Judgment Reviews Law at Guam (US)

In Guam, a United States territory, the legal system operates under U.S. federal law as well as local Guam law. The review of judgments in Guam follows many of the same procedures as those found in the broader U.S. judicial system, but there are some distinct aspects of Guam’s local legal system to consider. Below is an overview of the judgment review process in Guam:

1. Judicial Structure in Guam

The judicial system of Guam is structured similarly to the U.S. federal system but includes a local Superior Court and an Appellate Court.

Superior Court of Guam: This is the trial-level court, where civil, criminal, and family law cases are initially heard.

Divisions of the Superior Court: The court includes divisions for general civil and criminal cases, as well as family law matters.

Supreme Court of Guam: This is the highest court in Guam, handling appeals from the Superior Court. It functions similarly to the State Supreme Courts in the U.S. states.

Guam’s legal system is based on U.S. law, meaning that, while the courts in Guam follow local statutes, they also apply U.S. federal law and decisions made by U.S. courts.

2. Appeals Process in Guam

Appeals in Civil and Criminal Cases

Superior Court of Guam: This is where all civil and criminal cases start. A party that is dissatisfied with the judgment rendered by the Superior Court can appeal to the Supreme Court of Guam.

Grounds for Appeal: Appeals can be based on claims of legal errors, misinterpretation of the facts, or violations of constitutional or procedural rights.

Time Limits for Appeal: The time limit for filing an appeal in Guam is typically 30 days after the judgment or final order is entered, although the specific time may vary depending on the case type.

Supreme Court of Guam: The Supreme Court of Guam is the final appellate court in the territory and reviews appeals from the Superior Court of Guam.

Role of the Supreme Court: It reviews legal questions and the application of law but does not re-examine the factual findings of the lower court. The Court’s focus is on whether the law was correctly applied in the lower court’s decision.

Time Limits for Appeal: Appeals to the Supreme Court of Guam must generally be filed within 30 days from the date of the decision in the Superior Court.

3. Extraordinary Remedies

In addition to the standard appellate process, extraordinary remedies are available in Guam for the review of judgments in certain exceptional cases:

Writ of Habeas Corpus: In criminal cases, a writ of habeas corpus may be filed if an individual believes that their detention is unlawful. This writ compels the government to justify the detention in court.

Writ of Mandamus: This is an order directing a lower court or governmental agency to perform a duty they are required by law to do. A writ of mandamus can be used to challenge decisions that are alleged to involve clear legal error.

Writ of Prohibition: This is a legal order issued to prevent a lower court or governmental body from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting in an unlawful manner.

4. Federal Review in Guam

Because Guam is a U.S. territory, U.S. federal law applies in addition to local laws. If a judgment in Guam involves issues of federal law, constitutional rights, or civil liberties, the case may be reviewed in federal court, including potentially by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over Guam.

Federal Review of State and Local Judgments: If a party believes their federal constitutional rights were violated in a local case, they may seek relief in federal court after exhausting their local remedies.

For example, individuals in Guam can seek review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals or even file a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court if the case involves important issues of U.S. constitutional law.

5. Constitutional Review and Rights Protections

As part of the United States, Guam is governed by the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court of Guam must adhere to both local statutes and the U.S. Constitution, ensuring that the laws and judgments in Guam align with federal constitutional protections, such as the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause.

Federal Constitutional Review: If a person in Guam believes their constitutional rights have been violated (e.g., their right to a fair trial, due process, or equal protection under the law), they can appeal to the U.S. federal courts, specifically the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

6. Judgments of Guam in Relation to U.S. Law

In some cases, judgments in Guam may involve federal law, and certain appeals can be made based on violations of U.S. federal law or the U.S. Constitution. In this instance, the appeal may go beyond the Supreme Court of Guam to federal courts.

Appeals to the Ninth Circuit Court: Since Guam falls under the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, appeals involving federal law may be heard by the Ninth Circuit.

U.S. Supreme Court: In very rare cases, parties in Guam can petition the U.S. Supreme Court for further review if the case presents a significant issue of U.S. constitutional law or federal law.

7. International Review

While Guam follows U.S. law, it is important to note that, like other U.S. territories, judgments may be subject to international human rights protections under treaties such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). However, individuals seeking redress for human rights violations in Guam would typically seek review through U.S. federal courts first.

United Nations: If a case in Guam involves violations of international human rights law, individuals could seek redress through the United Nations Human Rights Committee after exhausting all domestic legal remedies.

8. Conclusion

The judgment review process in Guam aligns closely with the U.S. legal system, and individuals have access to several avenues for challenging judgments:

Appeals: Cases can be appealed to the Supreme Court of Guam, and further appeals may be made to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and, in exceptional cases, the U.S. Supreme Court.

Extraordinary Remedies: Such as the writ of habeas corpus, writ of mandamus, or writ of prohibition, which provide additional review mechanisms.

Federal Review: Issues of federal law or constitutional rights can be challenged in federal courts, including the Ninth Circuit.

International Review: After exhausting domestic remedies, individuals may also seek redress from international bodies, such as the United Nations.

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments