Judgment Reviews Law at DR Congo
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the legal framework for challenging court judgments is structured to provide avenues for appeals and enforcement disputes, ensuring that individuals have mechanisms to contest decisions they believe to be erroneous or unjust.
⚖️ Court Structure
The judiciary in the DRC comprises:
Courts of First Instance: Handle initial trials in civil, criminal, and commercial cases.
Courts of Appeal: Review decisions from the Courts of First Instance.
Court of Cassation: Serves as the highest court in the country, focusing on legal issues rather than factual determinations. It has specialized chambers for civil, commercial, social, and criminal matters. Its decisions are final and binding
🧾 Appeal Process
Ordinary Appeals: Parties can appeal decisions from the Courts of First Instance to the Courts of Appeal These appeals are "de novo," meaning new evidence or arguments can be introduced
Cassation Appeals: The Court of Cassation hears cassation appeals, which focus on legal issues rather than factual determinations It either upholds the decision from a lower court or quashes it; in such event, the Court will remand the case for reconsideration to the lower court considering the Court of Cassation’s decision on the questions of la
🧾 Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
The enforcement of foreign judgments in the DRC is governed by national legislation and international treatie. The country is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, facilitating the enforcement of foreign arbitral award. The enforcement of foreign court judgments may require specific legislative provisions or agreement.
🧾 Special Judicial Mechanism
Beyond the standard court system, the DRC has established specialized judicial bodis:
*Constitutional Court: Decides on constitutional matters, ensuring that laws and government actions comply with the Constitutin.
*
RELATED Blog
0 comments