Pain and Suffering Damages in Medical Malpractice Lawsuits under Personal Injury
Overview:
In a medical malpractice lawsuit, pain and suffering are classified as non-economic damages awarded to compensate a victim for the physical and emotional distress resulting from a healthcare provider’s negligence. These are a subset of damages available in personal injury law, which aims to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the negligence not occurred.
1. Definition of Pain and Suffering
Pain and suffering can be divided into two categories:
a) Physical Pain and Suffering
This includes:
Ongoing bodily pain
Discomfort caused by injuries or medical errors
Chronic pain due to incorrect diagnosis, surgical error, or failed treatment
b) Mental/Emotional Pain and Suffering
This includes:
Anxiety
Depression
Loss of enjoyment of life
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Emotional trauma from permanent disfigurement or disability
2. Pain and Suffering in the Context of Medical Malpractice
In medical malpractice cases, pain and suffering are often the most substantial part of the claim, especially where:
The patient endures long-term or permanent injury
There is disfigurement, disability, or death
Emotional harm is significant, e.g., a botched surgery causing infertility
3. Establishing Pain and Suffering
To succeed in a medical malpractice claim for pain and suffering, a plaintiff must prove:
a) Duty of Care
A doctor-patient relationship existed.
b) Breach of Duty
The medical professional acted outside the accepted standard of care.
c) Causation
The breach caused the injury or worsened the condition.
d) Damages
These include both economic and non-economic losses, such as pain and suffering.
4. Factors Considered by Courts in Awarding Pain and Suffering
Courts assess:
Severity and permanence of the injury
Type and duration of physical pain
Emotional trauma and its impact on daily life
Loss of quality of life
Age and life expectancy of the victim
Impact on personal relationships
Evidence often includes:
Medical records
Expert testimony
Psychological evaluations
Testimony from the plaintiff and family members
5. Quantifying Pain and Suffering
Unlike economic damages (like lost wages or medical bills), pain and suffering has no fixed value. Common methods include:
a) Multiplier Method
The total economic damages are multiplied (typically 1.5 to 5 times) based on severity.
b) Per Diem Method
A daily amount is assigned to the victim’s suffering and multiplied by the number of days the plaintiff suffered.
6. Case Law Examples
⚖️ Caparo v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 (UK — Duty of Care Framework)
Though not a medical malpractice case directly, this case provides the legal test to determine duty of care, applicable in all negligence claims, including medical malpractice:
Foreseeability of damage
Proximity between parties
Whether it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty
This case laid the foundation for establishing negligence in medical malpractice cases, which is essential before awarding pain and suffering damages.
⚖️ Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 (UK)
A seminal medical negligence case, it established the Bolam test, stating:
A doctor is not negligent if he acts in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical professionals.
Application to Pain and Suffering:
If the court finds a breach of duty under the Bolam test, and the breach caused harm, then the patient is entitled to both economic and non-economic damages, including pain and suffering.
⚖️ Wise v. Kaye [1962] 1 QB 638 (UK)
This case directly addresses pain and suffering as a head of damage. The plaintiff was rendered unconscious from the accident and remained so for a long time. The court held that:
"Pain and suffering are separate heads of damage and can be awarded even if the plaintiff was unconscious."
This highlights that the capacity to feel pain is not essential to claim damages — if the injury itself would objectively cause pain or suffering, the plaintiff is entitled to compensation.
7. Limitation and Caps
In some jurisdictions, statutory caps limit non-economic damages like pain and suffering in medical malpractice cases (e.g., in some U.S. states). However, these vary and may be challenged as unconstitutional depending on the legal system.
In the UK legal system, there is no fixed cap, but judicial guidelines (such as the Judicial College Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases) are used for consistency.
8. Challenges in Proving Pain and Suffering
Subjective nature: Pain cannot be easily quantified.
Need for expert testimony: Psychological and medical evidence is crucial.
Defense arguments: Insurers may argue the pain is exaggerated or caused by a pre-existing condition.
9. Conclusion
Pain and suffering damages in medical malpractice claims are a key part of personal injury law, offering compensation for the intangible impact of a medical professional’s negligence. While difficult to quantify, courts use established legal principles and case law to evaluate claims.
Understanding precedents like Bolam, Caparo, and Wise v. Kaye helps to frame the legal thresholds and justifications for awarding these damages. Ultimately, the goal is to recognize the full impact of injury — not just in financial terms, but in human suffering.
RELATED Blog
0 comments