Surgical Errors & Patients' Legal Rights under Personal Injury
Surgical Errors & Patients' Legal Rights under Personal Injury Law
Overview
Surgical errors are a serious category of medical malpractice under personal injury law. They occur when a healthcare provider deviates from the accepted standard of care during surgery, resulting in harm or injury to the patient. These errors may involve mistakes before, during, or after surgery, including wrong-site surgery, anesthesia errors, infections due to negligence, or failure to perform a procedure correctly.
Legal Framework
Surgical errors fall under medical malpractice, a subset of personal injury law that deals with negligence by medical professionals. The core elements that a patient must prove in a surgical error case are:
Duty of Care: The surgeon or medical professional owed a duty to the patient.
Breach of Duty: The surgeon failed to perform to the accepted medical standard.
Causation: The breach directly caused the patient’s injury.
Damages: The patient suffered harm, such as physical injury, additional medical expenses, pain, or emotional distress.
Common Types of Surgical Errors
Wrong-site surgery (operating on the wrong limb or organ)
Performing the wrong procedure
Leaving surgical instruments inside the patient
Anesthesia errors (overdose, allergic reaction, failure to monitor)
Nerve damage
Infections caused by negligence
Failure to monitor post-operative complications
Patients' Legal Rights
Patients have the right to:
Receive competent medical care consistent with accepted medical standards.
Be informed of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to surgery (informed consent).
Seek compensation for injuries caused by surgical errors.
Access medical records and expert opinions to prove malpractice.
File lawsuits within the statute of limitations (which varies by jurisdiction).
Case Law Examples
1. Helling v. Carey, 83 Wash. 2d 514 (1974)
Facts: The patient developed glaucoma but the doctor did not perform a simple screening test that was not commonly used for patients under 40.
Ruling: The court held that even though the test was not routine, the doctor breached the standard of care by not performing it, as it was a simple, low-cost test that could have prevented injury.
Significance: Established that the standard of care evolves with medical knowledge, and doctors may be liable if they fail to use reasonable diagnostic procedures.
2. Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
Facts: The patient underwent surgery without being fully informed about the risks involved, resulting in paralysis.
Ruling: The court ruled that doctors have a duty to disclose material risks to patients so that they can give informed consent.
Significance: Strengthened patients’ rights to informed consent and paved the way for lawsuits based on lack of disclosure.
3. Johnson v. Kokemoor, 545 N.W.2d 495 (Wis. 1996)
Facts: The surgeon failed to remove a surgical sponge left inside the patient, causing infection and injury.
Ruling: The court held the surgeon liable for negligence due to the “never event” of leaving a foreign object inside a patient.
Significance: Reinforced strict liability for preventable surgical errors and emphasized the importance of surgical checklists.
Proving Surgical Error Claims
Expert Testimony
In surgical error cases, expert testimony from qualified medical professionals is essential to establish:
The applicable standard of care.
How the surgeon breached that standard.
That the breach caused the injury.
Medical Records
Patients' legal teams will carefully review:
Surgical reports
Anesthesia records
Post-operative notes
Imaging and lab results
Damages Patients Can Recover
Medical expenses (current and future)
Lost wages and loss of earning capacity
Pain and suffering
Emotional distress
Disfigurement or permanent disability
Wrongful death damages (if surgery results in death)
Statute of Limitations
The time limit for filing surgical error lawsuits varies by state but typically ranges from 1 to 3 years from the date of injury or discovery of the injury.
Summary
Surgical errors constitute a breach of the medical standard of care and form a basis for medical malpractice claims under personal injury law. Patients have legal rights to compensation if harmed by negligent surgical conduct, including the right to informed consent and competent care. Successful claims hinge on proving the duty, breach, causation, and damages, usually through expert testimony and medical documentation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments