Intentional Torts and Personal Injury Lawsuits under Personal Injury
Intentional Torts and Personal Injury Lawsuits (under Personal Injury Law)
Overview:
Personal injury law allows an injured person to seek compensation when someone else's wrongful conduct causes harm. Among the categories of personal injury law, intentional torts are a significant subset.
Unlike negligence (where harm occurs due to carelessness), intentional torts occur when a person deliberately engages in actions that cause harm to another.
1. What Are Intentional Torts?
Intentional torts are civil wrongs resulting from intentional acts committed by one person against another. The intent is a key element. It doesn’t necessarily mean the person intended to cause harm, but that they intended to commit the act that led to the injury.
Common Types of Intentional Torts in Personal Injury Law:
Assault
Battery
False Imprisonment
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)
Trespass to Land
Trespass to Chattels
Conversion
Defamation (in some jurisdictions included under personal injury)
2. Detailed Explanation of Major Intentional Torts
A. Assault
Definition: An act that creates a reasonable apprehension in another of imminent harmful or offensive contact.
Key Point: No physical contact is necessary—just the threat or attempt is enough.
Case Law:
I de S et ux. v. W de S (1348, English Common Law): One of the earliest assault cases. The defendant swung a hatchet at a woman but didn’t hit her. Court held the act was assault since it caused fear of immediate harm.
B. Battery
Definition: Intentional, harmful, or offensive contact with another person without their consent.
Key Point: Unlike assault, physical contact is required.
Case Law:
Vosburg v. Putney (1891, Wisconsin Supreme Court): A boy lightly kicked another in the classroom, aggravating a prior injury. The court found the contact was intentional and unlawful, making it a battery—even if the harm wasn’t intended.
C. False Imprisonment
Definition: Unlawful restraint of a person’s freedom of movement without consent or legal justification.
Key Point: Can involve physical barriers or threats of force.
Case Law:
Big Town Nursing Home, Inc. v. Newman (1970, Texas Court of Civil Appeals): Newman was kept in a nursing home against his will with no legal authority. The court held the home liable for false imprisonment.
D. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)
Definition: Outrageous conduct that intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress.
Key Point: The conduct must be extreme and outrageous.
Case Law:
Wilkinson v. Downton (1897, English case): Defendant told the plaintiff her husband was injured as a joke. She suffered severe emotional distress. The court held the defendant liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
3. Legal Elements in an Intentional Tort Lawsuit
To succeed in a personal injury lawsuit based on an intentional tort, the plaintiff must prove:
Intent – The defendant acted with purpose or substantial certainty that harm would result.
Act – The defendant's conduct must be a volitional act.
Causation – The act must be the actual and proximate cause of the injury.
Injury/Damages – The plaintiff must have suffered a legally recognized harm (physical, emotional, financial, etc.).
4. Damages in Intentional Tort Cases
Plaintiffs can seek various types of damages:
Compensatory Damages – To cover medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, etc.
Nominal Damages – Symbolic compensation when legal rights are violated without major harm.
Punitive Damages – To punish egregious behavior and deter similar future conduct.
Example:
In State Rubbish Collectors Assn. v. Siliznoff (1952), the court awarded damages for IIED and upheld punitive damages because the defendant’s conduct was malicious and outrageous.
5. Defenses to Intentional Torts
Some common defenses include:
Consent – If the plaintiff consented to the act (e.g., in sports).
Self-defense – Reasonable force to protect oneself.
Defense of others or property
Privilege – Some parties (e.g., law enforcement) may be shielded in certain situations.
Case Example:
Katko v. Briney (1971): A homeowner set a spring gun to protect an abandoned house. The trespasser was injured. The court ruled that deadly force cannot be used to defend property alone, as human life is more valuable.
6. Intentional Torts vs. Negligence
| Intentional Tort | Negligence |
|---|---|
| Harm is caused deliberately | Harm is caused by carelessness |
| Plaintiff must prove intent | Plaintiff must prove duty, breach, causation, and damages |
| Often includes punitive damages | Mostly involves compensatory damages |
7. Real-World Applications and Importance
Workplace Assaults
Police Misconduct
Domestic Violence Cases
Abuse in Care Homes
Wrongful Detentions (e.g., in stores)
Conclusion
Intentional torts are a crucial part of personal injury law because they deal with willful misconduct. The law allows victims of such torts to hold wrongdoers accountable not just to recover losses, but also to affirm the legal rights of individuals to bodily integrity, freedom, and emotional safety.
Key takeaway: Intentional tort claims often carry a heavier moral and legal weight than negligence claims and can lead to significant punitive damages. Courts carefully evaluate both the intent behind the act and the nature of the harm caused.
RELATED Blog
0 comments