End of Life Care  under Health Law
đŸ”¹ Introduction
End of Life Care (EOLC) refers to medical, ethical, and legal practices concerning the care of individuals who are terminally ill or nearing death. It involves:
Palliative care: Managing pain, discomfort, and psychological distress.
Medical decision-making: Life-sustaining treatment, Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders, and withdrawal of treatment.
Patient autonomy: Respecting the wishes of patients regarding their treatment.
The legal framework around EOLC balances:
Right to life (Article 21, Indian Constitution)
Right to die with dignity
Medical ethics and professional obligations
Protection against criminal liability for withdrawing or withholding treatment
đŸ”¹ Key Legal Principles
Right to Life and Dignity
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which has been interpreted to include the right to die with dignity in cases of terminal illness.
Advance Directives / Living Wills
Legal documents where individuals express wishes regarding end-of-life treatment if they become incapacitated.
Physicians are legally bound to honor these directives, provided they are valid and clear.
Withholding or Withdrawing Life Support
Legally permissible if it aligns with patient’s consent, medical opinion, and ethical guidelines.
Requires careful adherence to procedure to avoid criminal liability for culpable homicide or abetment.
Doctrine of Informed Consent
Patients or legally authorized representatives must consent to or refuse treatment.
Doctors must provide full information about prognosis, risks, and benefits.
Medical Ethics and Professional Guidelines
Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations guide doctors on EOLC decisions.
đŸ”¹ Landmark Case Law
1. Common Cause v. Union of India (2018, Supreme Court of India)
Facts: Petition for recognition of living wills/advance directives allowing withdrawal of life support.
Held: The Supreme Court recognized passive euthanasia and legalized advance directives under strict conditions.
Principle: Individuals have the right to die with dignity, and medical practitioners must follow clear and valid advance directives.
2. Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011, Supreme Court of India)
Facts: Petition sought euthanasia for a patient in a persistent vegetative state for decades.
Held: Court allowed passive euthanasia under strict guidelines, rejecting active euthanasia.
Principle: Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is permissible in certain cases to protect patient dignity.
3. P. Rathinam v. Union of India (1994, Supreme Court of India) – partially overruled
Facts: Petition argued for legalization of suicide as a right under Article 21.
Held: Court initially held the right to life includes the right to die, but later overruled, reaffirming that suicide remains illegal.
Principle: The right to life is protected; passive measures in terminal illness are distinct from active suicide.
4. Maruti Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (High Court)
Facts: Petition on withdrawal of ventilator support for terminal patients.
Held: Court emphasized adherence to medical protocols, consent, and ethics to avoid criminal liability.
Principle: End-of-life decisions must follow structured medical and legal procedures.
đŸ”¹ Ethical and Legal Guidelines for End of Life Care
Assessment of Medical Futility
Treatment that offers no significant benefit to a terminally ill patient can be ethically withheld.
Consent and Counseling
Patients and families must be fully informed and involved in decision-making.
Documentation and Oversight
All decisions to withhold or withdraw life support should be properly documented.
Hospitals should have an Ethics Committee review in complex cases.
Palliative and Hospice Care
Focus on comfort, dignity, and quality of life, rather than prolonging life at all costs.
đŸ”¹ Key Legal Implications
Passive euthanasia is legal under strict conditions in India.
Advance directives are recognized but must meet procedural safeguards.
Active euthanasia remains illegal.
Doctors and hospitals must comply with medical, ethical, and procedural standards to avoid criminal liability.
Courts play a key role in balancing patient rights, medical ethics, and societal interests.
đŸ”¹ Conclusion
End-of-life care under health law emphasizes dignity, informed consent, and ethical medical practice. Legal developments, especially in India, provide a framework for passive euthanasia and advance directives, protecting both patients’ rights and medical professionals.
Key Takeaways:
Patients have a right to die with dignity in terminal illness cases.
Advance directives and living wills are legally enforceable if valid.
Medical practitioners must adhere to ethical guidelines, obtain consent, and document decisions.
Courts ensure that end-of-life decisions balance individual rights, medical ethics, and legal safeguards.
RELATED Blog
0 comments