Dental Malpractice Law under Personal Injury
Dental Malpractice Law — Personal Injury
Overview
Dental malpractice falls under the broader umbrella of medical malpractice and personal injury law. It arises when a dentist breaches the standard of care owed to a patient, resulting in injury or harm. Patients who suffer injury due to negligence in dental treatment can seek compensation.
Key Legal Principles
Duty of Care
Dentists owe their patients a professional duty to provide care consistent with accepted dental standards.
This includes proper diagnosis, treatment planning, obtaining informed consent, and performing procedures competently.
Breach of Duty
A dental malpractice claim requires showing that the dentist failed to meet the accepted standard of care.
Examples: improper extraction causing nerve damage, failure to diagnose oral cancer, or leaving instruments inside the mouth.
Causation
The patient must prove that the breach of duty directly caused their injury.
This usually requires expert testimony to link the dentist’s actions to the harm suffered.
Damages
Damages may include additional medical/dental treatment costs, pain and suffering, lost wages, and sometimes punitive damages if the conduct was egregious.
Informed Consent
Dentists must inform patients about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of treatment.
Failure to obtain informed consent can form the basis of a malpractice claim.
Statute of Limitations
There is a limited time to file a dental malpractice claim, often 1-3 years from the date of injury or discovery of injury.
Elements of a Dental Malpractice Claim
To succeed in a dental malpractice lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove:
Duty: The dentist owed a duty to the patient.
Breach: The dentist breached the applicable standard of care.
Causation: The breach caused the injury.
Damages: The patient suffered actual harm or loss.
Standard of Care in Dental Malpractice
The standard is generally measured by what a reasonably competent dentist would have done under similar circumstances.
This standard varies by specialty (e.g., orthodontics vs. oral surgery).
Expert dental testimony is usually required to establish the standard and prove breach.
Common Types of Dental Malpractice
Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose dental conditions.
Nerve injury during dental procedures.
Infections due to unsanitary conditions or poor technique.
Wrongful extraction or damage to adjacent teeth.
Improper administration of anesthesia.
Failure to refer patient to specialists when needed.
Relevant Case Law (Internal Knowledge Examples)
1. Helling v. Carey, 519 P.2d 981 (Wash. 1974)
Issue: Failure to perform a standard diagnostic test in eye care, extended by analogy to dental malpractice.
Ruling: Established that professionals must provide care consistent with community standards even if a condition is rare.
Significance: Analogously applied to dental cases, reinforcing the need for timely diagnosis and treatment.
2. Phillips v. Hardwick, 376 So.2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Issue: Dentist’s failure to obtain informed consent.
Ruling: The court held that lack of informed consent constitutes a breach of duty if the patient was not properly informed of risks.
Significance: Reinforced patients' rights to be fully informed before treatment.
3. Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., 124 N.E. 905 (N.Y. 1919)
Though originally related to amusement park injury, this case is often cited for the "assumption of risk" doctrine, which can sometimes be a defense in dental cases when patients assume known risks.
4. Jones v. Park Dental Group, 150 Cal. App. 3d 275 (1983)
Issue: Dental negligence in extraction causing nerve damage.
Ruling: Court held dentist liable due to failure to exercise reasonable care.
Significance: Reinforces liability where negligent acts cause physical injury.
Defenses in Dental Malpractice
Contributory or Comparative Negligence: Patient’s own negligence contributed to injury.
Assumption of Risk: Patient understood and accepted the risks of treatment.
Good Samaritan Defense: Rarely applies, but may protect dentists in emergency, non-patient care situations.
Statute of Limitations: Claim filed too late.
Practical Considerations for Patients
Seek a second opinion if injury occurs.
Collect all dental records and imaging.
Consult a dental malpractice attorney early.
Preserve evidence of injury and treatment.
Summary
Dental malpractice law protects patients from substandard dental care that causes injury. It requires proof of duty, breach, causation, and damages, with a heavy reliance on expert testimony to establish the accepted standard of care and negligence. Legal precedents have shaped the duty dentists owe to inform patients and to perform competent treatment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments