The role of Anna Hazare and other civic activists and NGOs in generating the public opinion for passing the national lokpal and lokayukta bill
Role of Anna Hazare, Civic Activists, and NGOs in Passing the Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill
1. Anna Hazare’s Movement
Anna Hazare, a veteran social activist, became the face of the 2011 anti-corruption movement in India.
He undertook hunger strikes (fasts) demanding the enactment of a strong Lokpal Bill to tackle corruption.
His movement galvanized mass public support and brought unprecedented media attention to the issue of corruption.
His approach was peaceful, rooted in Gandhian principles, which helped mobilize millions across the country, cutting across social and political lines.
2. Role of Civic Activists and NGOs
NGOs such as Common Cause, CIPLA, and others worked closely with activists to raise awareness about corruption.
They helped draft the Jan Lokpal Bill, which was a citizen-led version of the anti-corruption legislation.
These groups actively engaged in public campaigns, seminars, and workshops to educate citizens about the need for accountability and transparency.
NGOs used legal activism and public interest litigation (PILs) to push for reforms in the judiciary and enforcement agencies.
3. Impact on Public Opinion and Legislation
The combined efforts of Anna Hazare, civic activists, and NGOs sharpened public discourse on corruption.
There was a significant rise in public demand for a strong anti-corruption law.
The government faced enormous pressure from civil society and the media to act.
The movement led to the eventual passing of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, which established an independent anti-corruption ombudsman at the central and state levels.
4. Key Judicial Interventions and Case Laws
These cases contributed to setting the judicial context for anti-corruption efforts:
Vineet Narain v. Union of India (1998):
The Supreme Court directed reforms to insulate the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) from political interference, reinforcing independent investigation in corruption cases.
Common Cause v. Union of India (1996):
The Court recognized the right of public interest litigation and emphasized accountability in public administration.
Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India (2003):
The Court mandated transparency in administrative procedures and directed steps against corrupt practices.
People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (1997):
Affirmed the importance of protecting fundamental rights against corrupt administrative action.
Summary
| Aspect | Contribution/Impact |
|---|---|
| Anna Hazare’s Leadership | Mass mobilization, hunger strikes, media spotlight |
| Civic Activists and NGOs | Drafting Jan Lokpal Bill, awareness campaigns |
| Public Opinion | Heightened demand for accountability |
| Judicial Interventions | Strengthening anti-corruption frameworks |
Conclusion
The anti-corruption movement led by Anna Hazare, alongside the sustained efforts of civic activists and NGOs, was crucial in creating a groundswell of public opinion demanding transparency and accountability. Judicial pronouncements supported and shaped the framework within which the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act could be passed, making India’s fight against corruption more robust and citizen-centric.
RELATED Blog
0 comments