A comprehensive review of administrative law mechanisms for promoting social equity
Administrative Law and Social Equity
Administrative law in India plays a pivotal role in promoting social equity by:
Ensuring Equal Access: Providing marginalized communities with access to public services and benefits.
Upholding Constitutional Mandates: Enforcing provisions related to affirmative action and social justice.
Judicial Oversight: Courts ensuring that administrative actions align with principles of fairness and equality.
Landmark Cases Promoting Social Equity
1. Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India (1992) – The Mandal Commission Case
Background: The Supreme Court examined the implementation of the Mandal Commission's recommendations, which proposed a 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in government jobs and educational institutions.
Judgment: The Court upheld the reservation policy but capped it at 50% to maintain a balance between affirmative action and merit. It also introduced the concept of the "creamy layer," excluding the more affluent members of OBCs from the benefits.
Impact: This judgment institutionalized affirmative action for OBCs, promoting social equity in public employment and education.
2. Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal (2022)
Background: Deepika Singh, a nurse at PGIMER, Chandigarh, was denied maternity leave because she was living with her parents and not her husband.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that the definition of 'family' under Indian law should be inclusive of atypical family structures, such as those headed by single parents or other guardians.
Impact: This decision expanded the scope of social welfare benefits, ensuring that individuals from diverse family backgrounds are not excluded from entitlements.
3. State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shyamlal Dangi (2019)
Background: This case dealt with the issue of filing complaints without obtaining the necessary sanction from the competent authority.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that a complaint filed without the requisite sanction is not maintainable and can be quashed.
Impact: This judgment reinforced the principle that administrative actions must adhere to procedural requirements, ensuring fairness and preventing arbitrary actions.
4. Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008)
Background: The case challenged the implementation of the 27% reservation for OBCs in central educational institutions.
Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the reservation but mandated that the creamy layer within OBCs be excluded from the benefits.
Impact: This decision aimed to ensure that affirmative action benefits reach the truly disadvantaged sections of society, promoting social equity.
5. Ranjit D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra (1964)
Background: The case involved the prosecution of Ranjit D. Udeshi, a bookseller, for selling copies of D.H. Lawrence's book "Lady Chatterley's Lover," which was deemed obscene under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code.
Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 292, emphasizing the need to balance freedom of expression with societal morals.
Impact: This case highlighted the role of administrative law in regulating materials that may impact social morals, reflecting the state's duty to protect societal values.
Conclusion
Administrative law in India serves as a crucial instrument in promoting social equity by:
Implementing Affirmative Action: Through reservations and other policies, it ensures representation of marginalized communities in public institutions.
Expanding Welfare Benefits: Judicial interpretations have broadened the scope of entitlements, making them inclusive of diverse family structures.
Ensuring Procedural Fairness: By upholding procedural requirements, it prevents arbitrary administrative actions.
The judiciary's proactive role in interpreting administrative laws has been instrumental in advancing social justice, ensuring that the benefits of governance reach all sections of society.
RELATED Blog
0 comments