Energy regulation (FERC, DOE) D
Energy Regulation Overview
FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission)
Independent agency regulating the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas, and oil.
Authority includes overseeing wholesale electricity markets, licensing hydropower projects, approving natural gas pipeline rates, and ensuring reliability.
Created in 1977, succeeding the Federal Power Commission.
Enforces laws like the Federal Power Act (FPA) and Natural Gas Act (NGA).
DOE (Department of Energy)
Cabinet-level department created in 1977.
Responsible for national energy policy, nuclear safety, energy research, and energy conservation.
Oversees energy production, distribution, and efficiency programs.
Has regulatory authority over certain aspects of energy, but less direct market regulation than FERC.
Key Cases Involving FERC and DOE
Case 1: FPC v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591 (1944)
Background:
Before FERC existed, the Federal Power Commission (FPC) regulated natural gas rates. Hope Natural Gas challenged FPC’s rate-setting formula, arguing it violated due process by not basing rates on original cost.
Issue:
What standard should be used to evaluate whether utility rates are “just and reasonable”?
Holding:
The Supreme Court ruled that FPC’s rate regulation was constitutional and established the “end result” test. It held that rates are lawful if they are “just and reasonable” in total, not necessarily tied to original cost valuation.
Significance:
This decision gave regulators broad discretion to approve rates based on public interest and reasonable returns, rather than strict accounting rules. It laid the foundation for FERC’s approach to rate regulation.
Case 2: Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos., 498 U.S. 211 (1991)
Background:
This case concerned FERC’s jurisdiction over the pricing of natural gas under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). Mobil Oil challenged a FERC order requiring refunds on gas prices.
Issue:
Does FERC have the authority to require refunds for unjust and unreasonable natural gas prices?
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that FERC has broad authority under the NGA to regulate natural gas prices and require refunds when prices are found unjust or unreasonable.
Significance:
This case affirmed FERC’s regulatory reach over natural gas pricing and strengthened consumer protections against unfair rates.
Case 3: New York v. FERC, 535 U.S. 1 (2002)
Background:
FERC issued Order 2000, encouraging the creation of Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) to manage regional electricity grids. New York challenged the order, claiming FERC lacked authority.
Issue:
Does FERC have the authority to order utilities to join RTOs under the Federal Power Act?
Holding:
The Supreme Court upheld FERC’s order, affirming its authority to encourage regional grid coordination to promote efficient electricity markets.
Significance:
This case recognized FERC’s power to restructure electric markets and promote regional cooperation to enhance reliability and efficiency.
Case 4: FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass’n, 577 U.S. 260 (2016)
Background:
The case challenged FERC’s authority to regulate demand response in wholesale electricity markets.
Issue:
Does FERC have authority under the Federal Power Act to regulate demand response, where consumers reduce electricity use in response to price signals?
Holding:
The Supreme Court ruled that FERC has the authority to regulate demand response as part of wholesale electricity markets, finding it falls within its jurisdiction to ensure just and reasonable rates.
Significance:
This expanded FERC’s authority into innovative energy management tools and supported market-based mechanisms for grid efficiency.
Case 5: Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007)
Background:
This case involved the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), but DOE’s role in energy and environmental policy is closely related. Massachusetts sued EPA for failing to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles.
Issue:
Does the EPA have authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases?
Holding:
The Supreme Court ruled EPA does have authority to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants.
Significance:
This case significantly impacted energy policy, pushing federal agencies including DOE to integrate climate considerations into energy regulations and research.
Case 6: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel v. DOE (Hanford Case) (Not a Supreme Court case but important)
Background:
Concerns over DOE’s handling of nuclear waste disposal at Hanford site led to administrative challenges.
Issue:
Did DOE comply with environmental and safety standards in nuclear waste management?
Outcome:
The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board required DOE to provide more comprehensive safety analyses, reflecting strict oversight of DOE’s nuclear responsibilities.
Significance:
This case illustrates DOE’s regulatory responsibilities in nuclear safety and environmental protection, subject to judicial and administrative review.
Summary of Energy Regulation by FERC and DOE
FERC has broad authority over wholesale electricity markets, natural gas pipelines, and hydropower licensing, focusing on ensuring just and reasonable rates and reliable energy infrastructure.
DOE manages national energy policy, innovation, nuclear safety, and energy conservation, with a mix of regulatory and programmatic roles.
Judicial review ensures these agencies act within statutory authority and provide reasoned decisions.
Courts have upheld FERC’s authority to innovate market structures, regulate pricing, and promote grid efficiency.
DOE’s role in nuclear safety and energy policy intersects with environmental regulation and national security.
RELATED Blog
0 comments