Concept and justification of delegated legislation
📘 Topic: Concept and Justification of Delegated Legislation
🔍 What is Delegated Legislation?
Delegated legislation refers to the laws or rules made by an authority other than the legislature, under powers given to it by a parent or enabling Act passed by the legislature.
It is also known as:
Subordinate legislation
Secondary legislation
Executive rule-making
Examples:
Central Government making rules under the Income Tax Act
State Governments making notifications under the Motor Vehicles Act
🧠 Why Delegated Legislation? (Justification)
1. Complexity of Modern Governance
Legislatures cannot frame every minor rule in detail for complex areas like tax, environment, health, etc.
2. Time Constraints
Parliamentary time is limited; delegation helps speed up the process.
3. Need for Expertise
Experts in specific fields can create technical rules more effectively than general legislators.
4. Flexibility
Delegated legislation allows governments to respond quickly to changing circumstances (e.g., emergencies, disasters).
5. Administrative Convenience
Routine, repetitive, and operational matters are best handled by the executive.
6. Experimentation
Allows trial of new policies on a limited scale before applying nationwide.
⚖️ Constitutional & Legal Framework in India
Article 245 & Article 246: Legislature has law-making powers.
Delegation is permitted, but essential legislative functions (like defining legislative policy) cannot be delegated.
Doctrine of Separation of Powers applies, but not rigidly.
📚 Key Doctrines Related to Delegated Legislation
| Doctrine | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Excessive Delegation | Legislature must not delegate essential law-making power |
| Conditional Legislation | Legislature sets the law but leaves conditions for its application to the executive |
| Sub-delegation | Delegated authority should not further delegate unless explicitly allowed |
| Ultra Vires | If delegated legislation exceeds authority granted by the parent act, it is void |
📚 Landmark Case Laws with Detailed Explanation
Here are more than five landmark cases that have shaped the concept of delegated legislation in India:
🔹 1. In Re: Delhi Laws Act, 1951
Facts:
This was a reference case to determine whether the executive can modify laws when they are extended to other territories (like Delhi).
Issue:
Can Parliament delegate its legislative power to the executive, especially the power to amend or repeal a law?
Held:
Delegation is permissible.
However, essential legislative functions like laying down policy or changing the Act itself cannot be delegated.
Parliament can delegate power to fill in details or apply laws conditionally.
Significance:
This case laid the foundational limits of permissible delegation in India.
🔹 2. Ajoy Kumar Banerjee v. Union of India (1984)
Facts:
Challenge to government’s power under a statute to regulate the affairs of a sick industrial company.
Issue:
Whether such delegation of power to the executive is constitutional.
Held:
The Court held the delegation valid, as the parent Act laid down clear policy and guidelines.
Significance:
Confirmed that delegation is valid if there is a guiding policy and framework in the enabling Act.
🔹 3. Bidi Supply Co. v. Union of India (1956)
Facts:
The company challenged a tax imposed through delegated legislation, claiming it was excessive delegation.
Issue:
Can the executive be authorized to impose tax through delegated legislation?
Held:
Taxation is a substantive legislative function, and while some delegation is permissible, there must be sufficient safeguards and guidance.
Significance:
Reinforced that taxation powers cannot be freely delegated without limits.
🔹 4. Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India (1960)
Facts:
The executive issued a notification banning certain advertisements under a health law.
Issue:
Whether the provision giving such powers to the executive was valid.
Held:
The Court struck down the provision, calling it vague and lacking in clear guidelines, hence an example of excessive delegation.
Significance:
Important case for emphasizing that delegated powers must be guided and not arbitrary.
🔹 5. Rajnarain Singh v. Chairman, Patna Administration Committee (1954)
Facts:
A local body was given power to extend provisions of existing Acts to its jurisdiction.
Issue:
Was this delegation of legislative power valid?
Held:
The Court upheld the delegation because the legislature had already made the law, and the executive was only applying it conditionally.
Significance:
Approved the concept of conditional legislation, where law is made by the legislature but its application is left to the executive.
🔹 6. State of Tamil Nadu v. Sabanayagam (1998)
Facts:
Challenge to a government notification regarding welfare schemes.
Issue:
Whether such delegated legislation can be challenged for violating fundamental rights.
Held:
Delegated legislation is subject to judicial review like any other executive action.
Significance:
Affirmed that delegated legislation must not violate constitutional rights.
🔹 7. Vasantlal Maganbhai v. State of Bombay (1961)
Facts:
The Bombay government issued orders under delegated powers for sugar price control.
Issue:
Whether such economic regulation through delegated legislation was valid.
Held:
Delegation was valid, and executive was best suited to handle economic matters, provided the law gave broad policy framework.
Significance:
Recognized economic and technical areas as valid fields for delegation.
🧾 Summary Table: Case Laws on Delegated Legislation
| Case Name | Principle Established |
|---|---|
| In Re Delhi Laws Act (1951) | Essential functions cannot be delegated |
| Ajoy Kumar Banerjee (1984) | Valid delegation with policy and guidelines |
| Bidi Supply Co. (1956) | Tax powers must be clearly authorized |
| Hamdard Dawakhana (1960) | No vague or unguided delegation |
| Rajnarain Singh (1954) | Validity of conditional legislation |
| State of Tamil Nadu v. Sabanayagam (1998) | Delegated legislation is subject to fundamental rights |
| Vasantlal Maganbhai (1961) | Delegation is suitable for technical/economic matters |
🧠 Conclusion
Delegated legislation is an essential tool of modern governance.
It is constitutional and valid, as long as:
The policy is laid down by the legislature.
The delegate’s powers are limited, guided, and supervised.
It does not infringe fundamental rights.
Courts have clearly drawn the line between permissible delegation and excessive delegation.
Judicial oversight ensures that executive rule-making respects the Constitution.
RELATED Blog
0 comments