Role of agencies in rulemaking
📘 Topic: Role of Agencies in Rulemaking
✅ What is Rulemaking?
Rulemaking refers to the process by which government agencies (administrative bodies) create rules, regulations, or by-laws under the authority delegated to them by the legislature. This is known as delegated legislation or subordinate legislation.
✅ Who Are These “Agencies”?
Agencies include various government departments, statutory authorities, regulatory bodies, and public sector organizations (like SEBI, RBI, TRAI, etc.) that are empowered by law to formulate rules or policies within specific domains.
🔍 Role of Agencies in Rulemaking
Implementation of Legislative Policy:
Agencies fill in the technical and procedural details needed to implement statutes passed by Parliament or State Legislatures.
Efficiency in Governance:
Since legislatures cannot handle all specific aspects of a complex, modern administration, agencies are authorized to make rules as per their expertise.
Flexibility:
Agencies can adapt rules more easily and quickly than the legislature to meet changing circumstances or technical advancements.
Expertise-Based Governance:
Specialized agencies bring domain-specific knowledge into rulemaking (e.g., SEBI for securities, RBI for banking, etc.).
Quasi-Legislative Power:
Agencies exercise quasi-legislative power when they make rules, regulations, and guidelines that have the force of law.
🏛️ Landmark Case Laws Explaining Role of Agencies in Rulemaking
1. Re Delhi Laws Act, 1951 (AIR 1951 SC 332)
Facts:
The case dealt with the constitutionality of delegated legislation and how far the legislature can delegate its power to the executive or other agencies.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that delegation of legislative power is permissible as long as the essential legislative function (laying down policy) is retained by the legislature.
Significance:
This foundational case laid down that agencies can make rules, but the legislature must lay down the policy and guiding principles.
2. Ajoy Kumar Banerjee v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 1130
Facts:
Challenged certain rules made by the Coal India Ltd. under delegated authority concerning service conditions of employees.
Held:
The Court upheld the power of the agency to frame rules if done within the scope of the enabling Act.
Significance:
It confirmed that public sector undertakings and statutory corporations can frame service rules if authorized by statute.
3. Vasanlal Maganbhai Sanjanwala v. State of Bombay, AIR 1961 SC 4
Facts:
The Bombay Tenancy Act empowered the Collector to fix rent. The question was whether such delegated power was excessive.
Held:
The Court upheld the delegation and ruled that as long as adequate guidance and safeguards are present, such delegation is valid.
Significance:
Recognized that field-level agencies can be entrusted with rulemaking functions provided policy control remains with the legislature.
4. Avinder Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1979 SC 321
Facts:
Challenge to municipal bye-laws made under the Punjab Municipal Act.
Held:
The Court upheld the validity of municipal rulemaking and emphasized that local bodies are vital in framing rules suited to local needs.
Significance:
Demonstrated how local administrative agencies play an important role in decentralized rulemaking.
5. Indian Express Newspapers v. Union of India, AIR 1986 SC 515
Facts:
Petition challenged the imposition of customs duty on newsprint under a rule framed by the executive.
Held:
The Supreme Court laid down guidelines for judicial review of delegated legislation, stating that rules can be struck down if they are:
Ultra vires (beyond the power)
Arbitrary
Violative of fundamental rights
Significance:
Confirmed the limits of agency power and the role of courts in reviewing rules made by agencies.
6. Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd., (1997) 5 SCC 516
Facts:
Challenged the levy of market fee by the Agricultural Market Committee under rules made under the statute.
Held:
The Court upheld the power of the committee, stating that such agencies are competent to impose fees under rulemaking powers if authorized.
Significance:
Reinforced that specialized sectoral agencies (like agricultural committees) have a legitimate role in rulemaking.
7. State of T.N. v. M. Krishnamurthy, AIR 1980 SC 538
Facts:
Concerned a challenge to admission rules framed by the state government under delegated authority in education.
Held:
The Court ruled that agencies can frame rules for admissions and other academic matters provided they are consistent with constitutional provisions and parent statutes.
Significance:
Confirmed that education departments and universities have valid powers to frame regulations affecting students.
🔍 Summary of Legal Principles from Case Laws
| Case Name | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|
| Re Delhi Laws Act (1951) | Delegated legislation is valid if essential functions are retained by legislature |
| Ajoy Kumar Banerjee (1984) | PSUs and corporations can frame service rules if authorized |
| Vasanlal Maganbhai (1961) | Field-level officers can exercise discretion if policy is clear |
| Avinder Singh (1979) | Local bodies have an important rulemaking role |
| Indian Express (1986) | Delegated legislation is subject to judicial review |
| Agri. Market Committee (1997) | Sectoral agencies can impose fees and regulate markets |
| M. Krishnamurthy (1980) | State and academic bodies can frame rules on education |
🧠 Conclusion
Agencies play a vital role in rulemaking, especially in areas requiring technical expertise, local governance, or sectoral regulation.
Rulemaking by agencies ensures efficiency, flexibility, and responsiveness in administration.
However, such power is not absolute — it must be:
Within the bounds of enabling law
Not arbitrary or excessive
Subject to judicial review
RELATED Blog
0 comments